Literature DB >> 19944005

Optimal duration of SLIT.

C Caffarelli1, F Cardinale, C Povesi, I Chinellato, M Sterpeto Loffredo.   

Abstract

A review of SLIT studies reveals that both cumulative dose and maintenance schedules have widely varied between the published clinical trials. Pre-co-seasonal treatment for pollen allergy seems to be better than coseasonal treatment. There is a number of studies evaluating different durations of SLIT, but the heterogeneity of the study design, allergen extracts and outcome measures make it difficult to produce a meta-analysis on SLIT efficacy according to duration. Overall,duration of both the build-up phase and the maintenance treatment does not seem to influence the effectiveness of SLIT. This suggests that the quality of the extract is more important in determining the clinical response to SLIT than duration of therapy. Further studies are warranted to establish optimal duration of SLIT treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19944005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0394-6320            Impact factor:   3.219


  3 in total

Review 1.  Nasobronchial interaction.

Authors:  Cemal Cingi; Nuray Bayar Muluk; Bengu Cobanoglu; Tolgahan Çatli; Oğuzhan Dikici
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Three-Year Follow-up Results of Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis Sensitized to House Dust Mites.

Authors:  Shin Hye Kim; Sue Jean Mun; Doo Hee Han; Jeong-Whun Kim; Dong-Young Kim; Chae-Seo Rhee
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Immunol Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.764

Review 3.  Nose and lungs: one way, one disease.

Authors:  Davide Caimmi; Alessia Marseglia; Giovanni Pieri; Serena Benzo; Luca Bosa; Silvia Caimmi
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 2.638

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.