AIM: Parenteral phenobarbitone was unavailable in South Africa from 2005 to 2006. This study aimed to establish the effectiveness of enteral phenobarbitone in the management of childhood status epilepticus. METHOD: Patients in status epilepticus (December 2005-June 2006) received 20 mg/kg phenobarbitone via nasogastric tube in addition to standard status interventions (benzodiazepine boluses, phenytoin infusion). Phenobarbitone concentrations were taken post loading. Phenobarbitone population pharmacokinetics was analysed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (7 female, 9 male) were assessed, median age 5 months (range 9 days-168 months). Nine patients received 20 mg/kg; the maximum total dosage administered was 80 mg/kg with a concentration of 283 micromol/L. The typical population value of the volume of distribution was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.6) L/kg with interindividual variability (as coefficient of variation) of 53% (95% CI, 9-74%). Seizure control was documented within 1 h (n= 8), 1(1)/(2) h (n= 1), 3 h (n= 1) and 4 h (n= 5) following enteral phenobarbitone loading. No adverse effects were apparent from the enteral phenobarbitone administration. CONCLUSION: Patients tolerated enteral loading with phenobarbitone. A single enteral loading dose resulted in adequate phenobarbitone exposure. This practice was a safe intervention for centres lacking parenteral phenobarbitone. Therapeutic concentrations and seizure control after enteral loading suggested a role for enteral phenobarbitone in the management of acute status epilepticus as well as prophylaxis against seizure recurrence.
AIM: Parenteral phenobarbitone was unavailable in South Africa from 2005 to 2006. This study aimed to establish the effectiveness of enteral phenobarbitone in the management of childhood status epilepticus. METHOD:Patients in status epilepticus (December 2005-June 2006) received 20 mg/kg phenobarbitone via nasogastric tube in addition to standard status interventions (benzodiazepine boluses, phenytoin infusion). Phenobarbitone concentrations were taken post loading. Phenobarbitone population pharmacokinetics was analysed using non-linear mixed effects modelling. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (7 female, 9 male) were assessed, median age 5 months (range 9 days-168 months). Nine patients received 20 mg/kg; the maximum total dosage administered was 80 mg/kg with a concentration of 283 micromol/L. The typical population value of the volume of distribution was 1.2 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8-1.6) L/kg with interindividual variability (as coefficient of variation) of 53% (95% CI, 9-74%). Seizure control was documented within 1 h (n= 8), 1(1)/(2) h (n= 1), 3 h (n= 1) and 4 h (n= 5) following enteral phenobarbitone loading. No adverse effects were apparent from the enteral phenobarbitone administration. CONCLUSION:Patients tolerated enteral loading with phenobarbitone. A single enteral loading dose resulted in adequate phenobarbitone exposure. This practice was a safe intervention for centres lacking parenteral phenobarbitone. Therapeutic concentrations and seizure control after enteral loading suggested a role for enteral phenobarbitone in the management of acute status epilepticus as well as prophylaxis against seizure recurrence.
Authors: Julie Autmizguine; Daniel K Benjamin; P Brian Smith; Mario Sampson; Philippe Ovetchkine; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Kevin M Watt Journal: Curr Clin Pharmacol Date: 2014
Authors: Nicholas S Abend; David Bearden; Ingo Helbig; Jennifer McGuire; Sona Narula; Jessica A Panzer; Alexis Topjian; Dennis J Dlugos Journal: Semin Pediatr Neurol Date: 2014-12-12 Impact factor: 3.042
Authors: Abhishek G Sathe; Richard C Brundage; Vijay Ivaturi; James C Cloyd; James M Chamberlain; Jordan J Elm; Robert Silbergleit; Jaideep Kapur; Lisa D Coles Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.689