Literature DB >> 19943391

Forest harvest increases runoff most during low flows in two boreal streams.

Rasmus Sørensen1, Eva Ring, Markus Meili, Lars Högbom, Jan Seibert, Thomas Grabs, Hjalmar Laudon, Kevin Bishop.   

Abstract

To understand how forest harvest influences the aquatic environment, it is essential to determine the changes in the flow regime. This paper presents changes in the hydrological regime during the first 2 y after harvest in two catchments of the Balsjö Catchment Study in Sweden. The changes were judged relative to a reference catchment, calibrated during an 18-mo pretreatment period starting in September 2004. From August 2006 through March 2008, there was an average of 35% more runoff from the harvested catchments relative to the reference. The flow increased most during the growing seasons and at base flows (<1 mm d(-1); 58-99% increase), followed by dormant season and intermediate flows (30-43%). No significant changes were observed during the highest flows (over 5 mm d(-1)), except for the spring flood a few weeks after harvest, which was delayed and attenuated. Large relative changes in low flow may influence the ecosystem by altering the aquatic habitat.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19943391     DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.7.357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ambio        ISSN: 0044-7447            Impact factor:   5.129


  8 in total

Review 1.  Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the Nordic countries.

Authors:  Per Gundersen; Ari Laurén; Leena Finér; Eva Ring; Harri Koivusalo; Magne Saetersdal; Jan-Olov Weslien; Bjarni D Sigurdsson; Lars Högbom; Jukka Laine; Karin Hansen
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.129

2.  Nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and suspended solids loads from forest clear-cutting and site preparation: long-term paired catchment studies from eastern Finland.

Authors:  Marjo Palviainen; Leena Finér; Ari Laurén; Samuli Launiainen; Sirpa Piirainen; Tuija Mattsson; Mike Starr
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Is the water footprint an appropriate tool for forestry and forest products: the Fennoscandian case.

Authors:  Samuli Launiainen; Martyn N Futter; David Ellison; Nicholas Clarke; Leena Finér; Lars Högbom; Ari Laurén; Eva Ring
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: explaining a weak nitrate response.

Authors:  Charles C Rhoades; James H McCutchan; Leigh A Cooper; David Clow; Thomas M Detmer; Jennifer S Briggs; John D Stednick; Thomas T Veblen; Rachel M Ertz; Gene E Likens; William M Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Relationship between structural features and water chemistry in boreal headwater streams--evaluation based on results from two water management survey tools suggested for Swedish forestry.

Authors:  Ragna Lestander; Stefan Löfgren; Lennart Henrikson; Anneli M Ågren
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Identifying and assessing the potential hydrological function of past artificial forest drainage.

Authors:  Eliza Maher Hasselquist; William Lidberg; Ryan A Sponseller; Anneli Ågren; Hjalmar Laudon
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 6.943

7.  Managing Swedish forestry's impact on mercury in fish: Defining the impact and mitigation measures.

Authors:  Karin Eklöf; Rolf Lidskog; Kevin Bishop
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.129

8.  Land use influences macroinvertebrate community composition in boreal headwaters through altered stream conditions.

Authors:  Micael Jonsson; Ryan M Burrows; Johan Lidman; Emma Fältström; Hjalmar Laudon; Ryan A Sponseller
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.943

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.