PURPOSE: We investigated the relationship among esophageal warming, pain perception, and the site of radiofrequency (RF) delivery in the left atrium (LA) during the course of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Such a procedure in awake patients is often linked to the development of visceral pain and esophageal warming. As a consequence, potentially dangerous complications have been described. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing RF ablation in the LA were studied. An esophageal probe (EP) capable of measuring endoesophageal temperature (ET) was positioned before starting the procedure. The relative position of the EP and the tip of the ablator were evaluated through fluoroscopy imaging before starting each RF delivery, during which the highest value of the temperature was collected. After RF withdrawal, the patients were asked to define the intensity of the experienced pain by using a score index ranging from 0 (no pain) to 4 (pain requiring immediate RF interruption). RESULTS: The mean ET value during ablation was 39.59 +/- 4.71 degrees C. The EP proximity to the ablator's tip showed a high correlation with the development of the highest ET values (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.41). Moreover, the highest values of pain intensity were reported when the RF was delivered to the atrial zones close to the EP projection (r = 0.50, CI 0.55-0.42) and when the highest ET levels were reached (r = 0.38, CI 0.30-0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Pain perception in LA ablation is significantly related to esophageal warming and is higher when the RF is delivered near the esophagus. It seems advisable to perform ET monitoring in sedated patients to avoid short- and long-term jeopardizing of the esophageal wall.
PURPOSE: We investigated the relationship among esophageal warming, pain perception, and the site of radiofrequency (RF) delivery in the left atrium (LA) during the course of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Such a procedure in awake patients is often linked to the development of visceral pain and esophageal warming. As a consequence, potentially dangerous complications have been described. METHODS: Twenty patients undergoing RF ablation in the LA were studied. An esophageal probe (EP) capable of measuring endoesophageal temperature (ET) was positioned before starting the procedure. The relative position of the EP and the tip of the ablator were evaluated through fluoroscopy imaging before starting each RF delivery, during which the highest value of the temperature was collected. After RF withdrawal, the patients were asked to define the intensity of the experienced pain by using a score index ranging from 0 (no pain) to 4 (pain requiring immediate RF interruption). RESULTS: The mean ET value during ablation was 39.59 +/- 4.71 degrees C. The EP proximity to the ablator's tip showed a high correlation with the development of the highest ET values (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient r = 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.41). Moreover, the highest values of pain intensity were reported when the RF was delivered to the atrial zones close to the EP projection (r = 0.50, CI 0.55-0.42) and when the highest ET levels were reached (r = 0.38, CI 0.30-0.45). CONCLUSIONS:Pain perception in LA ablation is significantly related to esophageal warming and is higher when the RF is delivered near the esophagus. It seems advisable to perform ET monitoring in sedated patients to avoid short- and long-term jeopardizing of the esophageal wall.
Authors: Eric Good; Hakan Oral; Kristina Lemola; Jihn Han; Kamala Tamirisa; Petar Igic; Darryl Elmouchi; David Tschopp; Scott Reich; Aman Chugh; Frank Bogun; Frank Pelosi; Fred Morady Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2005-11-09 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Jennifer E Cummings; Robert A Schweikert; Walid I Saliba; J David Burkhardt; Johannes Brachmann; Jens Gunther; Volker Schibgilla; Atul Verma; MarkAlain Dery; John L Drago; Fethi Kilicaslan; Andrea Natale Journal: Circulation Date: 2005-07-18 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Juan L Lequerica; Enrique J Berjano; Maria Herrero; Lemuel Melecio; Fernando Hornero Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-01-16 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jennifer E Cummings; Conor D Barrett; Kenneth N Litwak; Luigi DI Biase; Punam Chowdhury; Seil Oh; Chi Keong Ching; Walid I Saliba; Robert A Schweikert; J David Burkhardt; Shari DE Marco; Luciana Armaganijan; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2008-03-26
Authors: Sheldon M Singh; Andre d'Avila; Shephal K Doshi; William R Brugge; Rudolph A Bedford; Theofanie Mela; Jeremy N Ruskin; Vivek Y Reddy Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2008-08