S N Saleem1, M S Zaki. 1. Radiology Department, Kasr Al-Ainy Hospital, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt. aysearalasmak@hotmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: JSRD are rare autosomal recessive brain malformations. We hypothesized that MR imaging can assess fetuses at risk for JSRD and might influence their diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed cranial MR imaging for 12 fetuses (mean GA, 23 weeks; SD, 3.7) at 25% recurrence risk for JSRD. We correlated prenatal MR imaging findings with postnatal MR imaging and clinical outcome. Retrospectively, we compared posterior fossa measurements of the cases with those of 24 age-matched fetuses with proved normal brain MR imaging. Institutional review board approval and consents were obtained. Statistical methods included a t test and ANCOVA tests. RESULTS: Fetal MR imaging correctly diagnosed 3 cases at 22, 28, and 29 weeks of gestation as JSRD, and 9 cases as normal. In JSRD-affected fetuses, prenatal MR imaging detected narrow pontomesencephalic junction (isthmus) with deepening of the interpeduncular fossa and thick horizontally placed superior cerebellar peduncles (MTS), deformed anteriorly convex floor of the fourth ventricle, and midline cerebellar cleft in place of the hypoplastic vermis. Measurements on axial fetal MR imaging at pontomesencephalic junction, ratio of AP diameters of interpeduncular fossa to midbrain/isthmus, and ratio of the AP to transverse diameters of the fourth ventricle were significantly higher in JSRD-affected fetuses than in nonaffected cases and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging can diagnose JSRD in at-risk pregnancies by detecting posterior fossa signs. Measurements at the pontomesencephalic junction may enhance fetal MR imaging accuracy in diagnosing JSRD.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: JSRD are rare autosomal recessive brain malformations. We hypothesized that MR imaging can assess fetuses at risk for JSRD and might influence their diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively performed cranial MR imaging for 12 fetuses (mean GA, 23 weeks; SD, 3.7) at 25% recurrence risk for JSRD. We correlated prenatal MR imaging findings with postnatal MR imaging and clinical outcome. Retrospectively, we compared posterior fossa measurements of the cases with those of 24 age-matched fetuses with proved normal brain MR imaging. Institutional review board approval and consents were obtained. Statistical methods included a t test and ANCOVA tests. RESULTS: Fetal MR imaging correctly diagnosed 3 cases at 22, 28, and 29 weeks of gestation as JSRD, and 9 cases as normal. In JSRD-affected fetuses, prenatal MR imaging detected narrow pontomesencephalic junction (isthmus) with deepening of the interpeduncular fossa and thick horizontally placed superior cerebellar peduncles (MTS), deformed anteriorly convex floor of the fourth ventricle, and midline cerebellar cleft in place of the hypoplastic vermis. Measurements on axial fetal MR imaging at pontomesencephalic junction, ratio of AP diameters of interpeduncular fossa to midbrain/isthmus, and ratio of the AP to transverse diameters of the fourth ventricle were significantly higher in JSRD-affected fetuses than in nonaffected cases and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: MR imaging can diagnose JSRD in at-risk pregnancies by detecting posterior fossa signs. Measurements at the pontomesencephalic junction may enhance fetal MR imaging accuracy in diagnosing JSRD.
Authors: M S Zaki; A Abdel-Aleem; G Abdel-Salam; S E Marsh; J L Silhavy; A J Barkovich; M E Ross; S N Saleem; W B Dobyns; J G Gleeson Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Peter R Hodgkins; Christopher M Harris; Fatima S Shawkat; Dorothy A Thompson; Kling Chong; Christine Timms; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; David S Taylor; Anthony Kriss Journal: Dev Med Child Neurol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.449
Authors: Catherine Limperopoulos; Richard L Robertson; Omar S Khwaja; Caroline D Robson; Judy A Estroff; Carole Barnewolt; Deborah Levine; Donna Morash; Luanne Nemes; Linda Zaccagnini; Adré J du Plessis Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Ruxandra Bachmann-Gagescu; Jennifer C Dempsey; Sara Bulgheroni; Maida L Chen; Stefano D'Arrigo; Ian A Glass; Theo Heller; Elise Héon; Friedhelm Hildebrandt; Nirmal Joshi; Dana Knutzen; Hester Y Kroes; Stephen H Mack; Sara Nuovo; Melissa A Parisi; Joseph Snow; Angela C Summers; Jordan M Symons; Wadih M Zein; Eugen Boltshauser; John A Sayer; Meral Gunay-Aygun; Enza Maria Valente; Dan Doherty Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Maha S Zaki; Ghada M H Abdel Salam; Sahar N Saleem; William B Dobyns; Mahmoud Y Issa; Shifteh Sattar; Joseph G Gleeson Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2011-10-14 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: Robert G Alexander; Fahd Yazdanie; Stephen Waite; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Srinivas Kolla; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 5.152