Literature DB >> 19942340

Transrectal ultrasound-guided implantation of Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT): surgical technique and clinical results after a mean follow-up of 2 years.

Andrea Gregori1, Ai Ling Romanò, Francesco Scieri, Francesco Pietrantuono, Giacomo Piero Incarbone, Antonio Salvaggio, Antonio Granata, Franco Gaboardi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with the male Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) system, implanted using fluoroscopy for guidance, has been described with promising clinical results.
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aims to describe the surgical technique in detail and to evaluate the continence recovery and complication rate of a cohort of male patients with SUI after RP. All patients were treated with a modified technique that uses transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for guidance and that may be performed under local anaesthesia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between June 2005 and March 2009, we operated on 79 consecutive patients with post-RP urodynamic intrinsic sphincter deficiency. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: ProACT system implantation was performed with TRUS guidance under general or local anaesthesia. MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative data and adverse events were recorded in all patients. Outcome data (24-h pad test, number of pads per day (PPD) used by patients, a validated incontinence quality of life questionnaire) were analysed in the 62 of 79 patients who completed the postoperative system adjustments. In this group of patients, the mean follow-up is 25 mo. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: According to the 24-h pad test and the mean number of PPD used, 41 patients were dry (66.1%), 16 patients improved (25.8%), and 5 patients failed treatment (8%). The dry rate in previously irradiated patients was 35.7%. Complications included intraoperative bladder perforations (2 of 79; 2.5%), transient urinary retention (1 of 79; 1.2%), migrations (3 of 79; 3.8%), and erosions (2 of 79; 2.5%). According to the degree of incontinence, the dry rate in patients with mild, moderate, and severe incontinence was, respectively, 85%, 63.6%, and 33.3%.
CONCLUSIONS: TRUS guidance for ProACT implantation results in success and complication rates that compare favourably with published data using fluoroscopy for guidance. Previous radiotherapy and severe incontinence seem to be a relative contraindication. Larger series and longer follow-up are progressing to establish long-term efficacy. 2009 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19942340     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

Review 1.  Combination surgery for erectile dysfunction and male incontinence.

Authors:  Dominic Lee; O Lenaine Westney; Run Wang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Neurogenic stress urinary incontinence: is there a place for Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT™ and ProACT™, Uromedica, Plymouth, MN, USA)? A retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Yoann Ronzi; Loïc Le Normand; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Xavier Game; Philippe Grise; Pierre Denys; Brigitte Perrouin-Verbe
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Simultaneous penile prosthesis and male sling/artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Dominic Lee; Claudio Romero; Frances Alba; O Lenaine Westney; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Management of recurrent post-prostatectomy incontinence after previous failed retrourethral male slings.

Authors:  Amr Al-Najar; Sascha Kaufmann; Soenke Boy; Carsten Maik Naumann; Peter-Klaus Jünemann; Christof Van Der Horst
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Adjustable Continence Therapy (ACT®) balloons to treat female stress urinary incontinence: effectiveness, safety and risk factors of failure and complication.

Authors:  Marie-Liesse de Guerry; Amélie Demeestere; Christophe Bergot; Astrid de Hauteclocque; Juliette Hascoet; Anne-Sophie Bajeot; Camille Ternynck; Xavier Gamé; Benoît Peyronnet; Grégoire Capon; Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Xavier Biardeau
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  A systematic review of the treatment for female stress urinary incontinence by ACT® balloon placement (Uromedica, Irvine, CA, USA).

Authors:  Véronique Phé; Kien Nguyen; Morgan Rouprêt; Vincent Cardot; Jérôme Parra; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Contemporary surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a review of technological advances in current continence surgery.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07

8.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence - Is It the Best Option?

Authors:  Yun-Sok Ha; Eun Sang Yoo
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing Adjustable Transobturator Male System (ATOMS) and Adjustable Continence Therapy (ProACT) for male stress incontinence.

Authors:  Javier C Angulo; Sandra Schönburg; Alessandro Giammò; Francisco J Abellán; Ignacio Arance; David Lora
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.