Literature DB >> 19942102

Measuring vs estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation.

Christine A White1, Greg A Knoll, Emilio D Poggio.   

Abstract

Evaluation of kidney function is crucial in the care of kidney transplant recipients and in the design and interpretation of clinical trials in transplantation. Kidney function is most commonly assessed in both instances using serum creatinine concentration or an estimate of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) based on serum creatinine. These are inexpensive, widely available, and easily administered. Both have significant drawbacks, notably with respect to their inability to accurately identify changes in GFR. Novel markers of GFR such as cystatin C and beta-trace protein show promise as accurate and sensitive markers of GFR but have not yet been adequately evaluated in kidney transplantation. In addition, they are relatively expensive compared to creatinine and their assays are not available in most clinical laboratories. Glomerular filtration rate measurement using a variety of different available tracers and techniques is infrequently used in either clinical care or research protocols because of its cost and cumbersomeness. This review will discuss the merits and pitfalls of the various tools available to evaluate GFR in kidney transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19942102     DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2009.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)        ISSN: 0955-470X            Impact factor:   3.943


  7 in total

Review 1.  Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: Still searching for the best marker.

Authors:  Josefina Santos; La Salete Martins
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-06

2.  Routine determination of GFR in renal transplant recipients by HPLC quantification of plasma iohexol concentrations and comparison with estimated GFR.

Authors:  Stéphanie Castagnet; Hélène Blasco; Patrick Vourc'h; Isabelle Benz-De-Bretagne; Charlotte Veyrat-Durebex; Christelle Barbet; Azmi Alnajjar; Bénédicte Ribourtout; Matthias Buchler; Jean-Michel Halimi; Christian R Andres
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.352

3.  The impact of interlaboratory differences in cystatin C assay measurement on glomerular filtration rate estimation.

Authors:  Christine A White; Andrew D Rule; Christine P Collier; Ayub Akbari; John C Lieske; Nathalie Lepage; Steve Doucette; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Accuracy of different equations in estimating GFR in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Authors:  Vandréa de Souza; Pierre Cochat; Muriel Rabilloud; Luciano Selistre; Mario Wagner; Aoumeur Hadj-Aissa; Olga Dolomanova; Bruno Ranchin; Jean Iwaz; Laurence Dubourg
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Performance of creatinine-based GFR estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Kamran Shaffi; Katrin Uhlig; Ronald D Perrone; Robin Ruthazer; Andrew Rule; John C Lieske; Gerjan Navis; Emilio D Poggio; Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine as a marker for early detection of decreasing glomerular filtration rate in renal transplants.

Authors:  Young Jae Jung; Hyang Ran Lee; Oh Jung Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2012-07-25

7.  A circulating exosomal microRNA panel as a novel biomarker for monitoring post-transplant renal graft function.

Authors:  Yimeng Chen; Xu Han; Yangyang Sun; Xiaozhou He; Dong Xue
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 5.310

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.