Literature DB >> 19941595

A lethal ovitrap-based mass trapping scheme for dengue control in Australia: I. Public acceptability and performance of lethal ovitraps.

S A Ritchie1, L P Rapley, C Williams, P H Johnson, M Larkman, R M Silcock, S A Long, R C Russell.   

Abstract

We report on the first field evaluation of the public acceptability and performance of two types of lethal ovitrap (LO) in three separate trials in Cairns, Australia. Health workers were able to set standard lethal ovitraps (SLOs) in 75 and 71% of premise yards in the wet and dry season, respectively, and biodegradable lethal ovitraps (BLOs) in 93% of yards. Public acceptance, measured as retention of traps by residents, was high for both trap types, with <9% of traps missing after 4 weeks. Traps retaining water after 4 weeks were 78 and 34% for the two SLO trials and 58% for the BLOs. The 'failure rate' in the 535 BLOs set in the field for 4 weeks was 47%, of which 19% were lost, 51% had holes from probable insect chewing, 23% were knocked over, 7% had dried by evaporation and 1% were split. There was no significant difference in the failure rate of BLOs set on porous (grass, soil and mulch) versus solid (tiles, concrete, wood and stone) substrates. The SLOs and the BLOs were readily acceptable to ovipositing Aedes aegypti L. (Diptera: Culicidae); the mean number of eggs/trap was 6 and 15, for the dry season and wet season SLO trial, respectively, and 15 for the BLO wet season trial. Indeed, 84-94% of premise yards had egg positive SLOs or BLOs. A high percentage of both wet and dry season SLOs (29 and 70%, respectively) and BLOs (62%) that were dry after 4 weeks were egg positive, indicating the traps had functioned. Lethal strips from SLOs and BLOs that had been exposed for 4 weeks killed 83 and 74%, respectively, of gravid Ae. aegypti in laboratory assays. These results indicate that mass trapping schemes using SLOs and BLOs are not rejected by the public and effectively target gravid Ae. aegypti. The impact of the interventions on mosquito populations is described in a companion paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19941595     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2009.00833.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Vet Entomol        ISSN: 0269-283X            Impact factor:   2.739


  18 in total

1.  Complete mitochondrial genomes of two cockroaches, Blattella germanica and Periplaneta americana, and the phylogenetic position of termites.

Authors:  Bo Xiao; Ai-Hui Chen; Yan-Yan Zhang; Guo-Fang Jiang; Chao-Chao Hu; Chao-Dong Zhu
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Evaluation of enhanced oviposition attractant formulations against Aedes and Culex vector mosquitoes in urban and semi-urban areas.

Authors:  Devi Shankar Suman
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Operational Aspects of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap.

Authors:  Verónica Acevedo; Manuel Amador; Gilberto Félix; Roberto Barrera
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.917

4.  Oviposition-Site Selection of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) Sand Flies: Attraction to Bacterial Isolates From an Attractive Rearing Medium.

Authors:  Madhavi L Kakumanu; Bahjat F Marayati; Coby Schal; Charles S Apperson; Gideon Wasserberg; Loganathan Ponnusamy
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Body size and wing shape measurements as quality indicators of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes destined for field release.

Authors:  Heng Lin Yeap; Nancy M Endersby; Petrina H Johnson; Scott A Ritchie; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.345

6.  Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): evaluation of natural long-lasting materials containing pyriproxyfen to improve control strategies.

Authors:  Emilia Seccacini; Laura Juan; Eduardo Zerba; Susana Licastro
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.289

7.  Evaluation of spatially targeted strategies to control non-domiciliated Triatoma dimidiata vector of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Corentin Barbu; Eric Dumonteil; Sébastien Gourbière
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-05-17

8.  Electric nets and sticky materials for analysing oviposition behaviour of gravid malaria vectors.

Authors:  Sisay Dugassa; Jenny M Lindh; Steve J Torr; Florence Oyieke; Steven W Lindsay; Ulrike Fillinger
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 2.979

9.  Using a new odour-baited device to explore options for luring and killing outdoor-biting malaria vectors: a report on design and field evaluation of the Mosquito Landing Box.

Authors:  Nancy S Matowo; Jason Moore; Salum Mapua; Edith P Madumla; Irene R Moshi; Emanuel W Kaindoa; Stephen P Mwangungulu; Deogratius R Kavishe; Robert D Sumaye; Dickson W Lwetoijera; Fredros O Okumu
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2013-05-04       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Sustained reduction of the dengue vector population resulting from an integrated control strategy applied in two Brazilian cities.

Authors:  Lêda N Regis; Ridelane Veiga Acioli; José Constantino Silveira; Maria Alice Varjal Melo-Santos; Wayner Vieira Souza; Cândida M Nogueira Ribeiro; Juliana C Serafim da Silva; Antonio Miguel Vieira Monteiro; Cláudia M F Oliveira; Rosângela M R Barbosa; Cynthia Braga; Marco Aurélio Benedetti Rodrigues; Marilú Gomes N M Silva; Paulo Justiniano Ribeiro; Wagner Hugo Bonat; Liliam César de Castro Medeiros; Marilia Sa Carvalho; André Freire Furtado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.