Literature DB >> 19941457

Bone regeneration and repair.

Nicholas J Panetta1, Deepak M Gupta, Michael T Longaker.   

Abstract

In the face of mounting clinical demand, and armed with reconstructive techniques that are technically challenging and frequently result in suboptimal patient outcomes, increasing focus is being placed on tissue engineering and regenerative medicine as a potential source of novel skeletal reconstructive approaches. Specifically, evidence is accumulating that highlights the promise of osteoprogenitor cell-based reconstructive strategies to meet the needs of an expanding patient population. Historically, the study of cell and molecular biology guiding physiologic and pathologic skeletal development, as well as endogenous bone regeneration following injury, has provided a wealth of information that lends insight toward potential parallel processes that may regulate the osteogenic differentiation of progenitor cells. Multiple progenitor cell populations are now known to possess a capacity to undergo robust osteogenic differentiation in the presence of appropriate environmental cues (hESC, BMSC, ASC, etc.) Recent investigations have put forth multiple advantages of ASC relative to BMSC. Of note, ASC exist in relative abundance, lack the need for in vitro expansion prior to utilization, and can be harvested with relative ease and reduced donor morbidity. Collectively, these factors, paired with promising in vitro and in vivo observations that speak toward the substantial osteogenic potential of ASC, have spurred enthusiasm to pursue the application of ASC in the maturation of skeletal tissue engineering applications. Yet, elucidating what structural and functional properties of scaffolds designed for ASC-mediated skeletal tissue engineering applications (porosity, pore size, composition, mechanical stability, degradation kinetics, etc.), as well as evolving our understanding and capacity to deliver spatiotemporally specific pro-osteogenic targeted molecular manipulation to progenitor cells, remain important hurdles to clear. The scope of this review encompasses the current state of ongoing investigations along these fronts, as well as what future direction will be critical to the transition of cell-based skeletal tissue engineering strategies to the bedside.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19941457     DOI: 10.2174/157488810791268618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther        ISSN: 1574-888X            Impact factor:   3.828


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of Effects of Mechanical Stretching on Osteogenic Potential of ASCs and BMSCs.

Authors:  Brian E Grottkau; Xingmei Yang; Liang Zhang; Ling Ye; Yunfeng Lin
Journal:  Bone Res       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 13.567

2.  Histological Criteria that Distinguish Human and Mouse Bone Formed Within a Mouse Skeletal Repair Defect.

Authors:  Xiaonan Xin; Xi Jiang; Liping Wang; Paiyz Mikael; Mary Beth McCarthy; Li Chen; Augustus D Mazzocca; Syam Nukavarapu; Alexander C Lichtler; David W Rowe
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  VEGF promotes osteogenic differentiation of ASCs on ordered fluorapatite surfaces.

Authors:  D Clark; X Wang; S Chang; A Czajka-Jakubowska; B H Clarkson; J Liu
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Gene expression dynamics during bone healing and osseointegration.

Authors:  Zhao Lin; Hector F Rios; Sarah L Volk; James V Sugai; Qiming Jin; William V Giannobile
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal regeneration and its implications for the treatment of tendinopathy.

Authors:  Jedd B Sereysky; Evan L Flatow; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  BMPR1A maintains skeletal stem cell properties in craniofacial development and craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Takamitsu Maruyama; Ronay Stevens; Alan Boka; Laura DiRienzo; Connie Chang; Hsiao-Man Ivy Yu; Katsuhiko Nishimori; Clinton Morrison; Wei Hsu
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Effects of Low-Concentration Graphene Oxide Quantum Dots on Improving the Proliferation and Differentiation Ability of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells through the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Duoling Xu; Chao Wang; Jie Wu; Yuanxiang Fu; Shujun Li; Wentao Hou; Ling Lin; Pei Li; Dongsheng Yu; Wei Zhao
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-18

8.  Fucoidan promotes osteoblast differentiation via JNK- and ERK-dependent BMP2-Smad 1/5/8 signaling in human mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Beom Su Kim; Hyo-Jin Kang; Ji-Yun Park; Jun Lee
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 8.718

9.  In Vitro Behavior of Human Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells on Poly(ε-caprolactone) Film for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Cecilia Romagnoli; Roberto Zonefrati; Gianna Galli; Dario Puppi; Alessandro Pirosa; Federica Chiellini; Francesco Saverio Martelli; Annalisa Tanini; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Mechanostimulation protocols for cardiac tissue engineering.

Authors:  Marco Govoni; Claudio Muscari; Carlo Guarnieri; Emanuele Giordano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.