Literature DB >> 19941087

Do we need a special ethics for research?

Sven Ove Hansson1.   

Abstract

Research is subject to more stringent ethical requirements than most other human activities, and a procedure that is otherwise allowed may be forbidden in research. Hence, risk-taking is more restricted in scientific research than in most non-research contexts, and privacy is better protected in scientific questionnaires than in marketing surveys. Potential arguments for this difference are scrutinized. The case in its favour appears to be weak. A stronger case can be made in favour of a difference in the opposite direction: If perilous or otherwise problematic activities have to be performed it is usually better to perform them in a research context where they are properly evaluated so that guidance is obtained for the future. However, retreating from current ethical demands on research is not a desirable direction to go. Instead, research ethics can serve to inspire the introduction of more stringent ethical principles in other social sectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19941087     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9186-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  15 in total

1.  Extending the boundaries of the Declaration of Helsinki: a case study of an unethical experiment in a non-medical setting.

Authors:  E D Richter; P Barach; T Berman; G Ben-David; Z Weinberger
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice.

Authors:  Richard Ashcroft
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 3.  Randomized trials stopped early for benefit: a systematic review.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; P J Devereaux; Neill K J Adhikari; Karen E A Burns; Christoph H Eggert; Matthias Briel; Christina Lacchetti; Teresa W Leung; Elizabeth Darling; Dianne M Bryant; Heiner C Bucher; Holger J Schünemann; Maureen O Meade; Deborah J Cook; Patricia J Erwin; Amit Sood; Richa Sood; Benjamin Lo; Carly A Thompson; Qi Zhou; Edward Mills; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Animal rights protests build.

Authors:  Nigel Williams
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Uncertainty and the ethics of clinical trials.

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2006

Review 6.  The current embryonic stem cell research federal funding policy. Undue respect to minority ethical considerations?

Authors:  Jordan Saltzberg
Journal:  J Leg Med       Date:  2008 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Street lighting for preventing road traffic injuries.

Authors:  Fiona R Beyer; Katharine Ker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

8.  Critical effects and exposure limits.

Authors:  S O Hansson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 9.  Recruitment to randomised trials: strategies for trial enrollment and participation study. The STEPS study.

Authors:  M K Campbell; C Snowdon; D Francis; D Elbourne; A M McDonald; R Knight; V Entwistle; J Garcia; I Roberts; A Grant; A Grant
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.014

10.  Protecting people in research: a comparison between biomedical and traffic research.

Authors:  Sara Svensson; Sven Ove Hannson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.525

View more
  1 in total

1.  Experiments: Why and How?

Authors:  Sven Ove Hansson
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.525

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.