BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed the reliability of evaluating asymmetrical strength and power deficits in the lower limbs of healthy middle-aged, healthy older and mobility-limited elders. We also explored the relationship between limb asymmetry and physical functioning. METHODS: We evaluated baseline knee extension strength and power asymmetry data from a cohort of older adults (n=57; 74.2±0.9 yrs, 26 male) who participated in a lower body strength training study (TS) and from a cross-sectional study of community dwelling volunteers. Cross-sectional participants were recruited into: healthy middle-aged (MH) (n=31; 47.4±4.8 yrs, 14 male), healthy older (OH) (n=28; 74.0±3.6 yrs, 16 male) and mobility-limited older (OML) (n=34; 77.8±4.5 yrs, 16 male) groups. Knee extensor strength (1RM) and power asymmetry at 40% and 70% of 1RM were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Knee extension 1RM, and peak power at 40% and 70% asymmetry ICCs exhibited excellent to good reliability in the TS and OML groups (TS= 0.8, 0.7 and 0.7, respectively; OML= 0.7, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively) but not in the MH and OH groups. No consistent association between lower limb asymmetry and measures of physical functioning was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of lower limb strength and power asymmetry is more reliable in mobility-limited elders when compared to healthy middle-aged and older subjects. The relationship of lower limb asymmetry to physical functioning is poor, in contrast to associations between the absolute strength and power of the individual limbs and physical functioning.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study assessed the reliability of evaluating asymmetrical strength and power deficits in the lower limbs of healthy middle-aged, healthy older and mobility-limited elders. We also explored the relationship between limb asymmetry and physical functioning. METHODS: We evaluated baseline knee extension strength and power asymmetry data from a cohort of older adults (n=57; 74.2±0.9 yrs, 26 male) who participated in a lower body strength training study (TS) and from a cross-sectional study of community dwelling volunteers. Cross-sectional participants were recruited into: healthy middle-aged (MH) (n=31; 47.4±4.8 yrs, 14 male), healthy older (OH) (n=28; 74.0±3.6 yrs, 16 male) and mobility-limited older (OML) (n=34; 77.8±4.5 yrs, 16 male) groups. Knee extensor strength (1RM) and power asymmetry at 40% and 70% of 1RM were evaluated for test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). RESULTS: Knee extension 1RM, and peak power at 40% and 70% asymmetry ICCs exhibited excellent to good reliability in the TS and OML groups (TS= 0.8, 0.7 and 0.7, respectively; OML= 0.7, 0.7, and 0.9, respectively) but not in the MH and OH groups. No consistent association between lower limb asymmetry and measures of physical functioning was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of lower limb strength and power asymmetry is more reliable in mobility-limited elders when compared to healthy middle-aged and older subjects. The relationship of lower limb asymmetry to physical functioning is poor, in contrast to associations between the absolute strength and power of the individual limbs and physical functioning.
Authors: V A Hughes; W R Frontera; M Wood; W J Evans; G E Dallal; R Roubenoff; M A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Roger A Fielding; Nathan K LeBrasseur; Anthony Cuoco; Jonathan Bean; Kelly Mizer; Maria A Fiatarone Singh Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: T Rantanen; J M Guralnik; R Sakari-Rantala; S Leveille; E M Simonsick; S Ling; L P Fried Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Cynthia Herrick; Karen Steger-May; David R Sinacore; Marybeth Brown; Kenneth B Schechtman; Ellen F Binder Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Kieran F Reid; Damien M Callahan; Robert J Carabello; Edward M Phillips; Walter R Frontera; Roger A Fielding Journal: Aging Clin Exp Res Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.636
Authors: Mark C Perry; Serena F Carville; I Christopher H Smith; Olga M Rutherford; Di J Newham Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 3.346
Authors: Charles A Odonkor; Julia C Thomas; Nicole Holt; Nancy Latham; Jessie Vanswearingen; Jennifer Sokol Brach; Suzanne G Leveille; Alan Jette; Jonathan Bean Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-05-08 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Neil A Kelly; Matthew P Ford; David G Standaert; Ray L Watts; C Scott Bickel; Douglas R Moellering; S Craig Tuggle; Jeri Y Williams; Laura Lieb; Samuel T Windham; Marcas M Bamman Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-01-09
Authors: Amy O Parkinson; Charlotte L Apps; John G Morris; Cleveland T Barnett; Martin G C Lewis Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: Jinmann Chon; Hee-Sang Kim; Jong Ha Lee; Seung Don Yoo; Dong Hwan Yun; Dong Hwan Kim; Seung Ah Lee; Yoo Jin Han; Yunsoo Soh; Yong Kim; Young Rok Han; Chang Won Won; Seonyoung Han Journal: Ann Rehabil Med Date: 2018-02-28
Authors: Kevin S Heffernan; Angela Chalé; Cynthia Hau; Gregory J Cloutier; Edward M Phillips; Patrick Warner; Heather Nickerson; Kieran F Reid; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Roger A Fielding Journal: J Aging Res Date: 2012-08-26