Literature DB >> 19940457

Patient physical characteristics and primary care physician decision making in preconception genetic screening.

V L Bonham1, S Knerr, W G Feero, N Stevens, J F Jenkins, C M McBride.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been growing emphasis on preconception care as a strategy to improve maternal and child health since the 1980s. Increasingly, development of genetic tests will require primary care providers to make decisions about preconception genetic screening. Limited research has been conducted on how primary care providers interpret patients' characteristics and use constructs, such as ethnicity and race, to decide whom to offer preconception genetic screening.
OBJECTIVE: This report assessed the influence of patient characteristics on decisions to offer preconception genetic screening.
METHODS: A web-based survey of family physicians was conducted. Physicians reviewed a clinical vignette that was accompanied by a picture of either a black or a white patient. Physicians indicated whether they would offer genetic screening, and if yes, what tests they would offer and what factors influenced their decisions.
RESULTS: The majority (69.2%) of physicians reported that they would not offer genetic screening. Respondents who reviewed the vignette accompanied by a picture of the black patient were more likely to offer screening (35% vs. 26%, p = 0.0034) and rated race as more important to their decision to offer testing than those who viewed the picture of the white patient (76% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patient race is important to physicians when making decisions about preconception genetic testing and that decision making is influenced by patients' physical characteristics. The reticence of physicians in this sample to offer preconception screening is an important finding for public health and clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19940457      PMCID: PMC2951723          DOI: 10.1159/000262328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  31 in total

1.  The feasibility of using ethnicity as a primary tool for antenatal selective screening for sickle cell disorders: pointers from the research evidence.

Authors:  Peter J Aspinall; Simon M Dyson; Elizabeth N Anionwu
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Esteban González Burchard; Elad Ziv; Natasha Coyle; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Hua Tang; Andrew J Karter; Joanna L Mountain; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Dean Sheppard; Neil Risch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Race and genomics.

Authors:  Richard S Cooper; Jay S Kaufman; Ryk Ward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan B VanGeest; Timothy P Johnson; Verna L Welch
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.651

5.  The Cystic Fibrosis mutation "arms race": when less is more.

Authors:  Wayne W Grody; Garry R Cutting; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Family physicians' beliefs about genetic contributions to racial/ethnic and gender differences in health and clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Esther Warshauer-Baker; Vence L Bonham; Jean Jenkins; Nancy Stevens; Zintesia Page; Adebola Odunlami; Colleen M McBride
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2008-08-05

7.  Where is the "W"oman in MCH?

Authors:  Hani Atrash; Brian W Jack; Kay Johnson; Dean V Coonrod; Merry-K Moos; Phillip G Stubblefield; Robert Cefalo; Karla Damus; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The clinical content of preconception care: genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Benjamin D Solomon; Brian W Jack; W Gregory Feero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  The future is now: carrier screening for all populations.

Authors:  Beth A Pletcher; Susan J Gross; Kristin G Monaghan; Deborah A Driscoll; Michael S Watson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Authors:  W W Grody; G R Cutting; K W Klinger; C S Richards; M S Watson; R J Desnick
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of two-year Jewish genetic disease screening program in Atlanta: insight into community genetic screening approaches.

Authors:  Yunru Shao; Shuling Liu; Karen Grinzaid
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-01-07

2.  Personal genomic information management and personalized medicine: challenges, current solutions, and roles of HIM professionals.

Authors:  Amal Alzu'bi; Leming Zhou; Valerie Watzlaf
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  Preconception interventions in infertile couples.

Authors:  Nafisehsadat Nekuei; Ashraf Kazemi; Akbar Hasanzadeh
Journal:  J Educ Health Promot       Date:  2014-08-28

4.  Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected?

Authors:  Jason M Franasiak; Meir Olcha; Paul A Bergh; Kathleen H Hong; Marie D Werner; Eric J Forman; Rebekah S Zimmerman; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 8.822

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.