BACKGROUND: High stearic acid (STA) soybean oil is a trans-free, oxidatively stable, non-LDL-cholesterol-raising oil that can be used to replace trans fatty acids (TFAs) in solid fat applications. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the cardiovascular health effects of dietary STA compared with those of trans, other saturated, and unsaturated fatty acids. DESIGN: We reviewed epidemiologic and clinical studies that evaluated the relation between STA and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including plasma lipids and lipoproteins, hemostatic variables, and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In comparison with other saturated fatty acids, STA lowered LDL cholesterol, was neutral with respect to HDL cholesterol, and directionally lowered the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. STA tended to raise LDL cholesterol, lower HDL cholesterol, and increase the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol in comparison with unsaturated fatty acids. In 2 of 4 studies, high-STA diets increased lipoprotein(a) in comparison with diets high in saturated fatty acids. Three studies showed increased plasma fibrinogen when dietary STA exceeded 9% of energy (the current 90th percentile of intake is 3.5%). Replacing industrial TFAs with STA might increase STA intake from 3.0% (current) to approximately 4% of energy and from 4% to 5% of energy at the 90th percentile. One-to-one substitution of STA for TFAs showed a decrease or no effect on LDL cholesterol, an increase or no effect on HDL cholesterol, and a decrease in the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: TFA intake should be reduced as much as possible because of its adverse effects on lipids and lipoproteins. The replacement of TFA with STA compared with other saturated fatty acids in foods that require solid fats beneficially affects LDL cholesterol, the primary target for CVD risk reduction; unsaturated fats are preferred for liquid fat applications. Research is needed to evaluate the effects of STA on emerging CVD risk markers such as fibrinogen and to understand the responses in different populations.
BACKGROUND: High stearic acid (STA) soybean oil is a trans-free, oxidatively stable, non-LDL-cholesterol-raising oil that can be used to replace trans fatty acids (TFAs) in solid fat applications. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the cardiovascular health effects of dietary STA compared with those of trans, other saturated, and unsaturated fatty acids. DESIGN: We reviewed epidemiologic and clinical studies that evaluated the relation between STA and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors, including plasma lipids and lipoproteins, hemostatic variables, and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: In comparison with other saturated fatty acids, STA lowered LDL cholesterol, was neutral with respect to HDL cholesterol, and directionally lowered the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. STA tended to raise LDL cholesterol, lower HDL cholesterol, and increase the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol in comparison with unsaturated fatty acids. In 2 of 4 studies, high-STA diets increased lipoprotein(a) in comparison with diets high in saturated fatty acids. Three studies showed increased plasma fibrinogen when dietary STA exceeded 9% of energy (the current 90th percentile of intake is 3.5%). Replacing industrial TFAs with STA might increase STA intake from 3.0% (current) to approximately 4% of energy and from 4% to 5% of energy at the 90th percentile. One-to-one substitution of STA for TFAs showed a decrease or no effect on LDL cholesterol, an increase or no effect on HDL cholesterol, and a decrease in the ratio of total to HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS:TFA intake should be reduced as much as possible because of its adverse effects on lipids and lipoproteins. The replacement of TFA with STA compared with other saturated fatty acids in foods that require solid fats beneficially affects LDL cholesterol, the primary target for CVD risk reduction; unsaturated fats are preferred for liquid fat applications. Research is needed to evaluate the effects of STA on emerging CVD risk markers such as fibrinogen and to understand the responses in different populations.
Authors: Arne Astrup; Jørn Dyerberg; Peter Elwood; Kjeld Hermansen; Frank B Hu; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Frans J Kok; Ronald M Krauss; Jean Michel Lecerf; Philippe LeGrand; Paul Nestel; Ulf Risérus; Tom Sanders; Andrew Sinclair; Steen Stender; Tine Tholstrup; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Asghar Z Naqvi; Brian Harty; Kenneth J Mukamal; Anne M Stoddard; Mara Vitolins; Julie E Dunn Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Mia M Gaudet; Roni T Falk; Robert D Stevens; Marc J Gunter; James R Bain; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Nancy Potischman; Jolanta Lissowska; Beata Peplonska; Louise A Brinton; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Christopher B Newgard; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: May A Beydoun; Marie T Fanelli-Kuczmarski; Hind A Beydoun; Greg A Dore; Jose A Canas; Michele K Evans; Alan B Zonderman Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Heidi J Silver; Hakmook Kang; Charles D Keil; James A Muldowney; Heidi Kocalis; Sergio Fazio; Douglas E Vaughan; Kevin D Niswender Journal: Metabolism Date: 2014-01-17 Impact factor: 8.694