Literature DB >> 19939667

The potential impacts of biomass feedstock production on water resource availability.

K C Stone1, P G Hunt, K B Cantrell, K S Ro.   

Abstract

Biofuels are a major topic of global interest and technology development. Whereas bioenergy crop production is highly dependent on water, bioenergy development requires effective allocation and management of water. The objectives of this investigation were to assess the bioenergy production relative to the impacts on water resource related factors: (1) climate and weather impact on water supplies for biomass production; (2) water use for major bioenergy crop production; and (3) potential alternatives to improve water supplies for bioenergy. Shifts to alternative bioenergy crops with greater water demand may produce unintended consequences for both water resources and energy feedstocks. Sugarcane and corn require 458 and 2036 m(3) water/m(3) ethanol produced, respectively. The water requirements for corn grain production to meet the US-DOE Billion-Ton Vision may increase approximately 6-fold from 8.6 to 50.1 km(3). Furthermore, climate change is impacting water resources throughout the world. In the western US, runoff from snowmelt is occurring earlier altering the timing of water availability. Weather extremes, both drought and flooding, have occurred more frequently over the last 30 years than the previous 100 years. All of these weather events impact bioenergy crop production. These events may be partially mitigated by alternative water management systems that offer potential for more effective water use and conservation. A few potential alternatives include controlled drainage and new next-generation livestock waste treatment systems. Controlled drainage can increase water available to plants and simultaneously improve water quality. New livestock waste treatments systems offer the potential to utilize treated wastewater to produce bioenergy crops. New technologies for cellulosic biomass conversion via thermochemical conversion offer the potential for using more diverse feedstocks with dramatically reduced water requirements. The development of bioenergy feedstocks in the US and throughout the world should carefully consider water resource limitations and their critical connections to ecosystem integrity and sustainability of human food. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19939667     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  4 in total

1.  Bioenergy Development Policy and Practice Must Recognize Potential Hydrologic Impacts: Lessons from the Americas.

Authors:  David W Watkins; Márcia M G Alcoforado de Moraes; Heidi Asbjornsen; Alex S Mayer; Julian Licata; Jose Gutierrez Lopez; Thomas G Pypker; Vivianna Gamez Molina; Guilherme Fernandes Marques; Ana Cristina Guimaraes Carneiro; Hector M Nuñez; Hayri Önal; Bruna da Nobrega Germano
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  The potential of C4 grasses for cellulosic biofuel production.

Authors:  Tim van der Weijde; Claire L Alvim Kamei; Andres F Torres; Wilfred Vermerris; Oene Dolstra; Richard G F Visser; Luisa M Trindade
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 5.753

3.  Fast Growing Plantations for Wood Production - Integration of Ecological Effects and Economic Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael Bredemeier; Gerald Busch; Linda Hartmann; Martin Jansen; Falk Richter; Norbert P Lamersdorf
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-06-09

4.  Streamflow impacts of biofuel policy-driven landscape change.

Authors:  Sami Khanal; Robert P Anex; Christopher J Anderson; Daryl E Herzmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.