Literature DB >> 19938952

The mobile phone decreases fructose but not citrate in rabbit semen: a longitudinal study.

Nader Salama1, Tomoteru Kishimoto, Hiro-Omi Kanayama, Susumu Kagawa.   

Abstract

The negative impact of mobile phones on sperm motility has been previously described. Both fructose and citrate are important components in semen that facilitate sperm motility. To date, no studies have investigated the effect of exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted from the mobile phone on their levels.. Therefore, a longitudinal study using the adult rabbit as a model was undertaken. A total of 30 adult male rabbits were randomly divided into three groups. The first (phone) group was placed in specially designed cages, and exposed to radio frequency emitted from a mobile phone (900 MHz) kept in standby mode and positioned adjacent to the genitalia for 8 h daily for 12 weeks. The other two groups served as controls; the stress group which was housed in the same kind of cages to evaluate any cage-induced anxiety, and the control group which was housed in the conventional roomy cages. Semen samples were retrieved weekly. Sperm motility and viability, semen fructose and citrate, and serum testosterone were measured. Histological sections from the prostatic complex, ampulla, and vesicular gland were evaluated. A significant drop in both fructose levels (257 +/-11.6 vs. 489 +/- 8.4 mg %, the baseline level) and number of motile sperms (50 vs. 72%) was observedin the phone group at the 10th week. However, no correlation was found between the two values. The stress control animals showed a similar but significantly less decline in motility No significant changes in citrate levels or other study parameters were seen in the three animal groups throughout the study. In conclusion, the pulsed radio frequency emitted by the mobile phone kept in the standby position longitudinally affected sperm motility and fructose but not citrate levels in rabbit semen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19938952     DOI: 10.3109/19396360903013126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol Reprod Med        ISSN: 1939-6368            Impact factor:   3.061


  8 in total

1.  Exposure to mobile phone electromagnetic field radiation, ringtone and vibration affects anxiety-like behaviour and oxidative stress biomarkers in albino wistar rats.

Authors:  Abubakar Shehu; Aliyu Mohammed; Rabiu Abdussalam Magaji; Mustapha Shehu Muhammad
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 3.584

2.  The semen quality of the mobile phone users.

Authors:  R Rago; P Salacone; L Caponecchia; A Sebastianelli; I Marcucci; A E Calogero; R Condorelli; E Vicari; G Morgia; V Favilla; S Cimino; A F Arcoria; S La Vignera
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 3.  Electromagnetic pollution: another risk factor for infertility, or a red herring?

Authors:  Alexander Lerchl
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Impact of androgen deprivation therapy on sexual function.

Authors:  Clarisse R Mazzola; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 5.  Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: a review.

Authors:  Zaher O Merhi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Effect of radiofrequency radiation on reproductive health.

Authors:  Rajeev Singh; Ravindra Nath; Ajit Kumar Mathur; Radhey Shyam Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Male reproductive health under threat: Short term exposure to radiofrequency radiations emitted by common mobile jammers.

Authors:  Smj Mortazavi; Me Parsanezhad; M Kazempour; P Ghahramani; Ar Mortazavi; M Davari
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2013-04

Review 8.  The Contribution of In Vivo Mammalian Studies to the Knowledge of Adverse Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation on Human Health.

Authors:  Andrea Vornoli; Laura Falcioni; Daniele Mandrioli; Luciano Bua; Fiorella Belpoggi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.