Literature DB >> 19938053

A comparison of auditory brainstem responses and behavioral estimates of hearing sensitivity in Lemur catta and Nycticebus coucang.

Marissa A Ramsier1, Nathaniel J Dominy.   

Abstract

Primates depend on acoustic signals and cues to avoid predators, locate food, and share information. Accordingly, the structure and function of acoustic stimuli have long been emphasized in studies of primate behavioral and cognitive ecology. Yet, few studies have addressed how well primates hear such stimuli; indeed, the auditory thresholds of most primate species are unknown. This empirical void is due in part to the logistic and economic challenges attendant on traditional behavioral testing methods. Technological advances have produced a safe and cost-effective alternative-the auditory brainstem response (ABR) method, which can be utilized in field conditions, on virtually any animal species, and without subject training. Here we used the ABR and four methods of threshold determination to construct audiograms for two strepsirrhine primates: the ring-tailed lemur (Lemur catta) and slow loris (Nycticebus coucang). Next, to verify the general efficacy of the ABR method, we compared our results to published behaviorally-derived audiograms. We found that the four ABR threshold detection methods produced similar results, including relatively elevated thresholds but similarly shaped audiograms compared to those derived behaviorally. The ABR and behavioral absolute thresholds were significantly correlated, and the frequencies of best sensitivity and high-frequency limits were comparable. However, at frequencies < or =2 kHz, ABR thresholds were especially elevated, resulting in decreased agreement with behavioral thresholds and, in Lemur, the ABR 10-dB range starting points were more than 2 octaves higher than the behavioral points. Finally, a comparison of ABR- and behaviorally-derived audiograms from various animal taxa demonstrates the widespread efficacy of the ABR for estimating frequency of best sensitivity, but otherwise suggests caution; factors such as stimulus properties and threshold definition affect results. We conclude that the ABR method is a promising technique for estimating primate hearing sensitivity, but that additional data are required to explore its efficacy for estimating low-frequency thresholds. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19938053     DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20780

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Primatol        ISSN: 0275-2565            Impact factor:   2.371


  9 in total

1.  Social drive and the evolution of primate hearing.

Authors:  Marissa A Ramsier; Andrew J Cunningham; James J Finneran; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Assessing stimulus and subject influences on auditory evoked potentials and their relation to peripheral physiology in green treefrogs (Hyla cinerea).

Authors:  Nathan P Buerkle; Katrina M Schrode; Mark A Bee
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Primate communication in the pure ultrasound.

Authors:  Marissa A Ramsier; Andrew J Cunningham; Gillian L Moritz; James J Finneran; Cathy V Williams; Perry S Ong; Sharon L Gursky-Doyen; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Hearing and age-related changes in the gray mouse lemur.

Authors:  Christian Schopf; Elke Zimmermann; Julia Tünsmeyer; Sabine B R Kästner; Peter Hubka; Andrej Kral
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-12

5.  Auditory brainstem responses in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis): effects of frequency, level, sex and size.

Authors:  Katrina M Schrode; Nathan P Buerkle; Elizabeth F Brittan-Powell; Mark A Bee
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Auditory brainstem responses in the bat Carollia perspicillata: threshold calculation and relation to audiograms based on otoacoustic emission measurement.

Authors:  Johannes Wetekam; Christin Reissig; Julio C Hechavarria; Manfred Kössl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Modeling individual vocal differences in group-living lemurs using vocal tract morphology.

Authors:  Marco Gamba; Livio Favaro; Alessandro Araldi; Valentina Matteucci; Cristina Giacoma; Olivier Friard
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  Coevolution of vocal signal characteristics and hearing sensitivity in forest mammals.

Authors:  Benjamin D Charlton; Megan A Owen; Ronald R Swaisgood
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Receiver bias and the acoustic ecology of aye-ayes (Daubentonia madagascariensis).

Authors:  Marissa A Ramsier; Nathaniel J Dominy
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2012-11-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.