Literature DB >> 1993743

Evaluation of the Sceptor system for identification of bacteria of veterinary origin.

J R Papp1, C A Muckle.   

Abstract

The Sceptor system (Becton Dickinson Diagnostic Instrument Systems, Towson Md.) was assessed for its ability to identify veterinary clinical isolates. A total of 605 bacteria, including 315 isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 191 gram-negative nonenteric bacteria, and 99 gram-positive bacteria, were tested. Overall, 534 (88.3%) were correctly identified, 28 (4.6%) were not identified, 12 (2.0%) were incorrectly identified at the genus levels, and 32 (5.3%) were incorrectly identified at the species level. The Sceptor system correctly identified 292 (92.7%) isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, 165 (86.4%) gram-negative nonenteric bacteria, and 77 (77.8%) gram-positive bacteria. One hundred thirty organisms not contained in the data base were tested with the Sceptor system to assess the possibility of expanding the data base. The Sceptor system was an acceptable method for the identification of isolates of Enterobacteriaceae but not gram-negative nonenteric and gram-positive bacteria of animal origin. Development of a veterinary isolate-specific data base would improve the utility of the Sceptor system in veterinary diagnostic bacteriology.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1993743      PMCID: PMC269693          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.1.10-15.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Minitek Gram-Positive Set for identification of streptococci isolated from bovine mammary glands.

Authors:  J L Watts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A test of significance for determining if one new testing procedure is better than another relative to a standard procedure.

Authors:  A J Gross; M Huppert
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1971-08

3.  Identification of staphylococci from bovine udders: evaluation of the API 20GP system.

Authors:  J L Watts; W E Owens; S C Nickerson
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of the AutoSCAN-3 and Sceptor systems for Enterobacteriaceae identification.

Authors:  B F Woolfrey; R T Lally; C O Quall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Aeromonas hydrophila: ecology and toxigenicity of isolates from an estuary.

Authors:  J B Kaper; H Lockman; R R Colwell; S W Joseph
Journal:  J Appl Bacteriol       Date:  1981-04

6.  Yersinia enterocolitica: observations on some growth characteristics and response to selective agents.

Authors:  D A Schiemann
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Aeromonas hydrophila infection in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  G B Hubbard
Journal:  Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1981-06

8.  In vitro susceptibilities of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas sobria, and Aeromonas caviae to 22 antimicrobial agents.

Authors:  M R Motyl; G McKinley; J M Janda
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.

Authors:  M T Collins; E C Swanson
Journal:  Am J Vet Res       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 1.156

10.  Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  E C Swanson; M T Collins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.