| Literature DB >> 19937342 |
Martin Moche1, Stefanie Stremlau, Lars Hecht, Cornelia Göbel, Ivo Feussner, Christine Stöhr.
Abstract
Plant plasma membrane (pm) vesicles from mycorrhizalEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19937342 PMCID: PMC2799628 DOI: 10.1007/s00425-009-1057-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Planta ISSN: 0032-0935 Impact factor: 4.116
Fig. 1Shoot fresh weight based on nitrate supply and mycorrhizal infection. Mycorrhizal (open circle) and non-mycorrhizal (filled squares) plants were grown under different nitrate regime, and shoot fresh weight as indicator for biomass production was determined on the day of harvest (after 70–75 days). Mean values ± SD (n = 5)
Fig. 2Activities of plasma membrane-bound nitrite–NO reductase (NI-NOR) of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots in dependence on nitrate supply and colonisation rate. Tobacco plants were grown under limited phosphate regime (0.1 mM) with nutrient solution ranging from 2 to 25 mM NO3 − as indicated a. Colonisation rate is presented in relative units (1 corresponds to maximal theoretical mycorrhiza infection). As controls, also the non-mycorrhizal plants were studied for fungal infection. Proportions of arbuscules and intracellular hyphae are presented. n.d. not detected. b Plasma membrane vesicles (derived from the PEG phase) were prepared with the two-polymer phase system from mycorrhizal (open bars) and non-mycorrhizal (filled bars) roots. NO formation is shown in the presence of NaNO2 (1 mM) and reduced cytochrome c. c Polynomial correlation between NI-NOR activity and colonisation rate by G. mosseae. Data represent means from three independent experiments with three replicates per treatment and are tested with multiple t tests at the significance levels of P ≤ 0.05. Bars represent the mean ± SD (n = 9). Means sharing the same letters are not significantly different
Fig. 3Overview of membrane vesicles separation with aqueous two-phase system. Microsomal root fractions of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal plants were added to the aqueous two-phase system and separated into a polyethyleneglycol-rich phase (PEG phase) and a dextran-rich phase. The expected partitioning of the membrane vesicles is indicated
Biochemical characterisation of purified pm vesicles (PEG fraction) from differently cultivated tobacco roots
| Enzyme activity | M2N,0.1P | NM2N,0.1P | NM10N,3P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | |
| Vanadate-sensitive H+-ATPasea | 15.2 ± 5.2 | 20.9 ± 1.9 | 6.8 ± 2.4 | 9.3 ± 1.0 | 11.9 ± 3.6 | 11.5 ± 1.4 | 25.8 ± 11.1 | 19.9 ± 3.5 | 67.7 ± 8.1 |
| Nitrate-sensitive H+-ATPasea | 6.9 ± 2.4 | 6.3 ± 1.5 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ±1.2 | ND | 14.8 ± 2.6 | NM | ND |
| Azide-sensitive H+-ATPasea | 7.4 ± 3.6 | 7.9 ± 2.5 | ND | 4.8 ± 1.2 | 4.8 ± 0.7 | ND | 62.0 ± 4.5 | 39.8 ± 6.0 | ND |
| Cyt | 6.0 ± 1.9 | 14.6 ± 0.9 | ND | 3.6 ± 0.9 | 10.8 ± 1.5 | ND | 6.2 ± 2.8 | 21.7 ± 1.9 | ND |
| IDPase latencya | 21.4 ± 5.3 | 15.8 ± 2.7 | 7.4 ± 1.4 | 22.8 ± 3.4 | 19.6 ± 3.1 | 9.1 ± 3.1 | 8.1 ± 2.1 | 12.1 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 1.5 |
Tobacco plants were cultivated under N (2 mM nitrate) and P (0.1 mM phosphate) limitation with (M2N,0.1P) and without mycorrhizal infection (NM2N,0.1P). As control (NM10N,3P), also plants with sufficient N (10 mM nitrate) and P (3 mM phosphate) were tested. The pm vesicles were isolated using an aqueous two-phase partitioning system. Marker enzyme activities of the microsomal (MF), dextran (Dex-F) and PEG (PEG-F) fraction (pm fraction) are presented. Data represent mean values ± SD (n = 3)
ND Not detected, NM not measured
aEnzyme activities are expressed as μmol PO4 3− h−1 mg protein−1
bEnzyme activities are expressed as nmol Cyt c min−1 mg protein−1
Distribution of NI-NOR activity in root membrane fractions
| NI-NOR activity | M2N,0.1P | NM2N,0.1P | M10N,0.1P | NM10N,0.1P | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | MF | Dex-F | PEG-F | |
| Specific activity | 7.7 ± 3.4 | ND | 27.1 ± 2.2 | 10.1 ± 2 | ND | 29.3 ± 0.1 | 52.4 ± 50.1 | 16.4 ± 9.3 | 283.2 ± 14.5 | 21.5 ± 16.7 | 8.2 ± 3.1 | 82.9 ± 20.2 |
| Enrichment | 1 | – | 3.5 | 1 | – | 2.9 | 1 | 0.3 | 5.4 | 1 | 0.4 | 3.9 |
| Distribution (%) | 100 | – | 33.4 | 100 | – | 43.5 | 100 | 5.4 | 68.1 | 100 | 8.3 | 46.0 |
NI-NOR activity was tested in the microsomal fraction (MF), dextran fraction (Dex-F) and polyethylene glycol fraction (PEG-F) prepared from differently cultivated tobacco roots. Tobacco plants were cultivated under N (2 mM nitrate) and P (0.1 mM phosphate) limitation with (M2N,0.1P) and without mycorrhizal infection (NM2N,0.1P) and under optimal nitrogen regime with (M10N,0.1P) and without (NM10N,0.1P) mycorrhization (see also Fig. 2a). The membrane vesicles were isolated using an aqueous two-phase partitioning system. Specific NI-NOR activity is presented in [nmol NO h−1 (mg membrane protein)−1]. Data represent mean values ± SD (n = 3)
ND Not detected
Fatty acid composition in membrane fractions of tobacco roots under different nutrient regime and colonised by G. mosseae
| Fatty acid | Molar percentagea | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsomal fraction | Dextran fraction | Polyethyleneglycol fraction | |||||
| NM2N,0.1P | M2N,0.1P | NM2N,0.1P | M2N,0.1P | NM2N,0.1P | M2N,0.1P | NM10N,3P | |
| C15:0 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.45 ± 0.06 | 0.64 ± 0.11 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.08 | 0.49 ± 0.03 | 0.38 ± 0.04 |
| C15:1 | 0.43 ± 0.1 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.60 ± 0.17 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 0.30 ± 0.06 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.04 |
| C16:0 | 22.05 ± 0.52 | 21.90 ± 1.16 | 21.86 ± 0.49 | 21.53 ± 1.00 | 23.97 ± 0.62 | 23.26 ± 0.39 | 26.35 ± 2.76 |
| C16:1 (9Z) | 0.39 ± 0.07 | 0.37 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.12 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 0.50 ± 0.10 | 0.60 ± 0.07 | 0.96 ± 0.12 |
| C16:1 (11Z) | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 1.95 ± 2.09 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 2.84 ± 3.12 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.38 | 0.07 ± 0.03 |
| C18:0 | 3.43 ± 0.06 | 2.99 ± 0.21 | 3.30 ± 0.09 | 2.76 ± 0.22 | 3.58 ± 0.14 | 3.43 ± 0.35 | 3.96 ± 0.58 |
| C18:1 (9Z) | 2.71 ± 0.11 | 2.26 ± 0.16 | 3.07 ± 0.11 | 2.54 ± 0.14 | 2.44 ± 0.08 | 2.09 ± 0.19 | 1.21 ± 0.21 |
| C18:1 (11Z) | 0.71 ± 0.09 | 1.40 ± 0.66 | 0.78 ± 0.07 | 1.73 ± 0.87 | 0.89 ± 0.15 | 1.47 ± 0.37 | 2.52 ± 0.59 |
| C18:2 (9Z, 12Z) | 50.38 ± 0.26 | 48.66 ± 2.97 | 49.01 ± 1.00 | 47.39 ± 3.88 | 49.47 ± 0.57 | 48.58 ± 0.46 | 44.61 ± 2.84 |
| C18:3 (9Z, 12Z, 15Z) | 14.49 ± 0.32 | 15.18 ± 0.43 | 14.39 ± 0.74 | 15.27 ± 1.24 | 12.88 ± 0.09 | 13.44 ± 0.45 | 12.03 ± 1.71 |
| C19:0 | 0.22 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.11 | 0.25 ± 0.12 | 0.53 ± 0.28 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.55 ± 0.06 | 2.15 ± 1.14 |
| C20:0 | 1.32 ± 0.06 | 1.19 ± 0.26 | 1.38 ± 0.28 | 1.09 ± 0.19 | 1.56 ± 0.15 | 1.80 ± 0.19 | 2.60 ± 0.73 |
| C20:1 (11Z) | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 0.26 ± 0.07 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 0.29 ± 0.15 | 0.34 ± 0.10 | 0.32 ± 0.06 | 0.27 ± 0.05 |
| C20:1 (13Z) | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.00 | 0.14 ± 0.11 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.09 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.03 |
| C20:2 (11Z, 14Z) | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 0.22 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 0.17 ± 0.00 |
| C21:0 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.12 | 0.68 ± 0.07 | 0.55 ± 0.15 | 0.88 ± 0.07 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 1.23 ± 0.16 |
| C22:0 | 0.93 ± 0.15 | 0.96 ± 0.27 | 1.36 ± 0.10 | 0.90 ± 0.10 | 1.01 ± 0.19 | 1.13 ± 0.13 | 1.09 ± 0.08 |
| C23:0 | 0.37 ± 0.05 | 0.44 ± 0.11 | 0.50 ± 0.12 | 0.37 ± 0.14 | 0.35 ± 0.07 | 0.50 ± 0.03 | 0.45 ± 0.08 |
| C24:0 | 0.50 ± 0.09 | 0.42 ± 0.14 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 0.69 ± 0.02 | 0.58 ± 0.26 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.56 ± 0.16 |
Tobacco plants were cultivated and membranes prepared as described (see legend Table 1). Fatty acids were determined and the proportion is given as molar percentage on total fatty acid. Data represent mean values ± SD (n = 3)
aMolar percentage (total, 100) of fatty acids in membrane fractions of tobacco roots under different nutrient regime and colonised by G. mosseae (mean ± SD of the proportion of total fatty acids)
Ratio of fatty acid distribution of pm vesicles (PEG fraction) that originated from mycorrhizal or non-mycorrhizal plants, depending on nitrogen and phosphate supply
| Fatty acid | Ratio of fatty acid distribution of pm vesicles | |
|---|---|---|
| M2N,0.1P/NM2N,0.1P | NM10N,3P/NM2N,0.1P | |
| Minor variation caused by mycorrhiza or addition of N and P | ||
| Palmitic acid C16:0 | 0.97 ± 0.03 | 1.10 ± 0.10 |
| Stearic acid C18:0 | 0.96 ± 0.09 | 1.11 ± 0.15 |
| Linoleic acid C18:2 (9Z, 12Z) | 0.98 ± 0.01 |
|
| α-Linolenic acid C18:3 (9Z, 12Z, 15Z) | 1.04 ± 0.03 | 0.93 ± 0.12 |
| Behenic acid C22:0 | 1.16 ± 0.24 | 1.12 ± 0.21 |
| Lignoceric acid C24:0 | 0.96 ± 0.49 | 1.14 ± 0.60 |
| Decrease caused by mycorrhiza and addition of N and P | ||
| Pentadecanoic acid C15:0 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Oleic acid C18:1 (9Z) |
|
|
| |
|
|
| Increase caused by mycorrhiza and addition of N and P | ||
| Palmitoleic acid C16:1 (9Z) | 1.21 ± 0.24 |
|
| Vaccenic acid C18:1 (11Z) | 1.69 ± 0.44 |
|
| Arachidic acid C20:0 | 1.16 ± 0.14 | 1.68 ± 0.43 |
| Tricosanoic acid C23:0 |
| 1.30 ± 0.28 |
| Effects mainly caused by mycorrhiza | ||
| Palmitvaccenic acid C16:1 (11Z) | 11.96 ± 9.22 | 1.97 ± 0.71 |
| Effects mainly caused by addition of N and P | ||
| Gondoic acid C20:1 (11Z) | 1.00 ± 0.28 | 0.82 ± 0.22 |
| Paullinic acid C20:1 (13Z) |
|
|
| Nonadecanoic acid C19:0 |
|
|
| Heneicosanoic acid C21:0 | 1.10 ± 0.08 |
|
Tobacco plants were cultivated and membranes prepared as described (see legend Table 1). The molar percentage of each fatty acid in pm vesicles is presented as the quotient of mycorrhizal roots (M2N,0.1P) and control plants, as well as of plants well supplied with nutrients (NM10N,3P) and plants with N and P limitation (NM2N,0.1P), to distinguish between the effect of mycorrhiza and improved nutrient supply. Significant values are presented in bold using the t test (P < 0.05)
Distribution of palmitvaccenic acid in membrane fractions of mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal roots
| Plant cultivation | Palmitvaccenic acid (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Dextran fraction | Polyethylenglycol fraction | |
| Mycorrhizal (M2N,0.1P) | 84.5 ± 3.2 | 15.5 ± 3.2 |
| Non-mycorrhizal (NM2N,0.1P) | 51.2 ± 2.9 | 48.8 ± 2.9 |
Tobacco plants were cultivated and membranes prepared as described (see legend Table 1). The distribution of palmitvaccenic acid [C16:1 (11Z)] is presented as mean value ± SD (n = 3) in relation to the microsomal fraction (100%)