Literature DB >> 19937340

Energy-based hemostatic devices in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Paola Vincenza Sartori1, Fabrizio Romano, Fabio Uggeri, Giovanni Colombo, Roberto Caprotti, Cristina Giannattasio, Mauro Alessandro Scotti, Alberto Delitala, Massimo Prada, Franco Uggeri.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In literature, few papers compare different hemostatic devices in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. This sequential cohort study analyzes the outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed by different hemostatic instruments, to evaluate if any of them has any advantage over the other and as secondary endpoints, the impact of body mass index (BMI) and tumor size on the indication, and the outcome of laparoscopic adrenalectomy.
METHODS: Forty-six patients, aged 54.6 +/- 46 years, underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy over 5 years. Mean BMI was 27 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2). Twenty-four patients had a left tumor, and 22 had a right one. Patients were divided into two groups according to the hemostatic device: Ultracision was used in 26 patients, and Ligasure was used in 20. Groups were well matched for histology, tumor size and site, BMI, gender, and age.
RESULTS: Mean operating time was 126.5 +/- 52 min, blood losses were 101 +/- 169 mm, conversion rate was 6.5%, morbidity was 26%, and hospitalization was 5.3 +/- 2.5 days. Groups did not differ for surgical time, blood losses, complications, and conversion rate; BMI and length of surgery were not related. Tumor side and size did not affect surgical time, regardless of the hemostatic tool. Patients submitted to left adrenalectomy bled more (p = 0.007) and had more complications (p = 0.016) than those undergone operation on the right side.
CONCLUSIONS: Obesity (BMI > 30) and large masses do not contraindicate laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Left adrenalectomies bleed more and have a higher morbidity. Hemostatic device choice is up to surgeon's preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19937340     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-009-0563-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  24 in total

1.  The positive impact of laparoscopic adrenalectomy on complications of adrenal surgery.

Authors:  L M Brunt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-11-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Hepatic surgery using the Ligasure vessel sealing system.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Claudio Franciosi; Roberto Caprotti; Fabio Uggeri; Franco Uggeri
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Use of the ligaSure vessel sealing system in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.

Authors:  Patsy S H Soon; Michael W Yeh; Mark S Sywak; Stan B Sidhu
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.872

4.  Laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy using the LigaSure vessel sealing system.

Authors:  Nihat Yavuz
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.878

5.  Effectiveness of LigaSure diathermy coagulation in liver surgery.

Authors:  Antonio Chiappa; Emilio Bertani; Roberto Biffi; Andrew P Zbar; Giuseppe Viale; Giancarlo Pruneri; Massimo Bellomi; Marco Venturino; Bruno Andreoni
Journal:  Surg Technol Int       Date:  2008

6.  Results of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for large and potentially malignant tumors.

Authors:  Jean-François Henry; Frederic Sebag; Maurizio Iacobone; Eric Mirallie
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2002-06-06       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Use of the electrothermal bipolar vessel system (EBVS) in laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  Mario Guerrieri; Francesca Crosta; Angelo De Sanctis; Maddalena Baldarelli; Giovanni Lezoche; Roberto Campagnacci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic splenectomy: ligasure versus EndoGIA: a comparative study.

Authors:  Fabrizio Romano; Roberta Gelmini; Roberto Caprotti; Alessia Andreotti; Marcello Guaglio; Chiara Franzoni; Franco Uggeri; Massimo Saviano
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Electrothermal bipolar vessel sealing device vs. ultrasonic coagulating shears in laparoscopic colectomies: a comparative study.

Authors:  Roberto Campagnacci; Angelo de Sanctis; Maddalena Baldarelli; Massimiliano Rimini; Giovanni Lezoche; Mario Guerrieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic surgery is safe for large adrenal lesions.

Authors:  P S H Soon; M W Yeh; L W Delbridge; C P Bambach; M S Sywak; B G Robinson; S B Sidhu
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 4.424

View more
  2 in total

1.  Advanced sealing and dissecting devices in laparoscopic adrenal surgery.

Authors:  Leonardo Solaini; Luca Arru; Giulia Merigo; Matteo Tomasoni; Federico Gheza; Guido Alberto Massimo Tiberio
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 2.  The impact of the ultrasonic, bipolar and integrated energy devices in the adrenal gland surgery: literature review and our experience.

Authors:  Renato Patrone; Claudio Gambardella; Roberto Maria Romano; Clarizia Gugliemo; Chiara Offi; Claudia Andretta; Antonio Vitiello; Ernesto Tartaglia; Luigi Flagiello; Alessandra Conzo; Claudio Mauriello; Giovanni Conzo
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.