| Literature DB >> 19937285 |
Boryana Stamova1, Peter G Green, Yingfang Tian, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Isaac N Pessah, Robin Hansen, Xiaowei Yang, Jennifer Teng, Jeffrey P Gregg, Paul Ashwood, Judy Van de Water, Frank R Sharp.
Abstract
Gene expression in blood was correlated with mercury levels in blood of 2- to 5-year-old boys with autism (AU) compared to age-matched typically developing (TD) control boys. This was done to address the possibility that the two groups might metabolize toxicants, such as mercury, differently. RNA was isolated from blood and gene expression assessed on whole genome Affymetrix Human U133 expression microarrays. Mercury levels were measured using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed and partial correlations between gene expression and mercury levels were calculated, after correcting for age and batch effects. To reduce false positives, only genes shared by the ANCOVA models were analyzed. Of the 26 genes that correlated with mercury levels in both AU and TD boys, 11 were significantly different between the groups (P(Diagnosis*Mercury) ≤ 0.05). The expression of a large number of genes (n = 316) correlated with mercury levels in TD but not in AU boys (P ≤ 0.05), the most represented biological functions being cell death and cell morphology. Expression of 189 genes correlated with mercury levels in AU but not in TD boys (P ≤ 0.05), the most represented biological functions being cell morphology, amino acid metabolism, and antigen presentation. These data and those in our companion study on correlation of gene expression and lead levels show that AU and TD children display different correlations between transcript levels and low levels of mercury and lead. These findings might suggest different genetic transcriptional programs associated with mercury in AU compared to TD children.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19937285 PMCID: PMC3006666 DOI: 10.1007/s12640-009-9137-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurotox Res ISSN: 1029-8428 Impact factor: 3.911
Fig. 2Mercury levels in children with autism (AU) and in typically developing control children from the general population (TD). The X-axis shows the samples. The Y-axis on the left shows the mercury (Hg) levels in μg/l and the Y-axis on the right shows the log2Hg levels. Symbols show Hg levels in AU (black), Hg levels in TD (gray); and circles show Hg levels (μg/l) and triangles show log2 Hg values (log2Hg)
Fig. 1Analysis design—Venn diagram of the three ANCOVA models used to generate the genes significantly correlating with mercury (Hg) levels. GE gene expression, TD typically developing control children from the general population, AU children with autism, Batch a group of microarrays that were processed together. Gene List A genes whose expression correlates with Log2Hg levels in each of the TD and AU models separately (P(Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05), with no significant differences in the correlations between the two groups in the combined AU + TD model (P(Diagnosis*Log2Hg) > 0.05). Gene List B genes whose expression correlates with Log2Hg levels in each of the TD and AU models separately (P(Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05), and had significant differences in the correlations between the two groups in the combined AU + TD model (P(Diagnosis*Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05). Gene List C genes whose expression correlates with Log2Hg levels in the TD model (P(Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05) but not in the AU model (P(Log2Hg) > 0.05), and which had significant differences in the correlations between the two groups in the combined AU + TD model (P(Diagnosis*Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05). Gene List D represents genes whose expression correlates with Log2Hg levels in the AU model (P(Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05) but not in the TD model (P(Log2Hg) > 0.05), and which had significant differences in the correlations between the two groups in the combined AU + TD model (P(Diagnosis*Log2Hg) ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 3Numbers of genes that significantly correlate (P ≤ 0.05) with Hg levels: in children with autism (AU); and in typically developing control children from the general population (TD). The analyses used to produce the gene lists for A, B, C, and D are shown in Fig. 1. Three ANCOVAs were performed for TD, AU, and TD + AU and the numbers of significant genes are provided for each comparison and area of overlap
Fig. 4Genes correlating with Hg levels in AU and TD subjects (List A). Heat map of the partial correlation coefficients (numbers in each cell) of the gene expression and Hg levels in TD and AU. Genes are indicated in the rows and the columns indicate the TD and AU diagnostic classes
Top biological functions for the gene lists A, B, C, D
| Top functions | Genes (+ [in bold]; − [in italics]) |
|---|---|
| List A: Common genes | |
| Apoptosis |
|
| Cell-to-cell signaling interaction |
|
| Cell-mediated immune response—cytokine secretion |
|
| Immune response |
|
| Response to oxidative stress |
|
| Transcription regulation, DNA dependent |
|
| List B: Contrasting genes | |
| Cellular assembly and organization | |
| Synapse density and axon extension | NTRK3 ( |
| Chromosome segregation and alignment | NCAPD3 ( |
| Cytoskeleton anchoring and biogenesis | FLNB ( |
| Cellular compromise | |
| Vestibular ganglion neuron degeneration | NTRK3 ( |
| Actin filament disorganization | FLNB ( |
| Small molecule biochemistry | |
| Biotin binding | KRT1 ( |
| | NTRK3 ( |
| Apoptosis of neurons and granular cells, sensory neuron survival | NTRK3 ( |
| List C: Genes correlating with mercury (TD only) | |
| Cell death | |
| Apoptosis (A.) of brain cells |
|
| Axon recovery and regeneration |
|
| Apoptosis of corticospinal neurons |
|
| Killing of neurons |
|
| Killing of normal cells |
|
| Cell death of interneurons |
|
| Normal cell death delay |
|
| Brain cell death |
|
| Brain cell loss |
|
| Memory B cell and neuron survival |
|
| Pro-B lymphocyte survival |
|
| Apoptosis of pre-T lymphocytes |
|
| Cell morphology | |
| Red blood cell morphology |
|
| Memory B cell division delay |
|
| Mitochondria transmembrane potential |
|
| Mitochondria permeabilization |
|
| Neuron branching |
|
| Axon sprouting and projection |
|
| Synapse plasticity |
|
| Axon remodeling |
|
| Gene expression | |
| Transcription |
|
| Expression |
|
| Activation |
|
| Co-Activation of TCF binding site |
|
| Transactivation |
|
| Repression |
|
| List D: Genes correlating with mercury (AU only) | |
| Cell morphology | |
| Vacuolation of embryonic, epithelial and kidney cell lines |
|
| Length of actin stress fibers |
|
| Morphology of intercalated discs and myofibrils |
|
| Morphology of focal adhesions |
|
| Elongation of gonadal cell lines |
|
| Amino acid metabolism | |
| Glutamine utilization, glutathione and |
|
| Transport of |
|
| Antigen presentation | |
| Infiltration of multinucleated giant cells |
|
| Antibacterial response of organism |
|
| Antigen processing and presentation of peptide or polysaccharide antigen via MHC class II |
|
Direction of correlation between gene expression level and blood mercury level is presented in bold and italics (bold = positive correlation, italics = negative correlation). For List A, direction of correlation is based on the correlation of gene expression and mercury levels in the TD class. For List B, directions of correlations for mercury levels and gene expression in both TD and AU classes are presented in parenthesis. For List C, directions of correlations of mercury and gene expression levels in the TD class are presented. For List D, directions of correlations of mercury and gene expression levels in the AU class are presented
Chromosome enrichment for the probe sets from the four list (lists A, B, C, and D)
| List* | Probe sets in list, count | Chromosome | Probe set, count | % probe sets/chromosome |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 15 | 2 | 4 | 26.7 | 0.04 |
| C | 316 | 19, 7, 13 | 30, 23, 10 | 9.3, 7.2, 3.1 | 0.02, 0.03, 0.08 |
| D | 189 | 1, 8 | 25, 11 | 13.1, 5.8 | 0.04, 0.08 |
Significant enrichment was considered at P ≤ 0.1
* List B did not show any significant chromosome enrichment at P ≤ 0.1
Fig. 5Genes correlating with Hg levels both in AU and TD, except that the correlation coefficients are significantly different from each other (List B). Heat map of the partial correlation coefficients (numbers in each box) of the gene expression and Hg levels in TD and AU. Genes are indicated in rows, and diagnoses (TD or AU) are indicated in the columns
Fig. 6Genes with the ten highest positive and the ten lowest negative correlations of gene expression with Hg levels for the TD subjects (List C). Heat map of the partial correlation coefficients (numbers in the boxes) of the gene expression and Hg levels in TD and AU. Genes are on the Y-axis, and diagnoses are on the X-axis
Fig. 7Genes with the ten highest positive and the ten lowest negative correlations of gene expression with Hg levels for the AU subjects (List D). Heat map of the partial correlation coefficients (numbers in boxes) of the gene expression and Hg levels in TD and AU. Genes are on the Y-axis, and diagnoses are on the X-axis
Fig. 8The number one network derived from all of the genes in Lists A, B, C, and D which participate in cell death, protein conformation, cellular assembly and organization, cellular function, and maintenance
Fig. 9Canonical pathways over-represented in at least one of the four categories from the genes that correlate with mercury levels in TD subjects (List C) and that correlate with mercury levels in AU subjects (List D). TD (+) = red = positively correlated genes from List C. TD (−) = blue = negatively correlated genes from List C. AU (+) = hatched red = positively correlated genes from List D. AU (−) = hatched blue = negatively correlated genes from List D
Fig. 10TGF-β signaling pathways. The colors represent genes whose expression correlates with blood mercury levels in typically developing boys (TD) but not in boys with autism (AU). Red = positive correlation