Sandhi Maria Barreto1, Roberta Carvalho de Figueiredo. 1. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva e Social, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil. sbarreto@medicina.ufmg.br
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between chronic diseases and health risk behaviors and self-perceived health status by gender. METHODS: A total of 39.821 adults (30+ years old) who participated in the system Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico (VIGITEL--Telephone-Based Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases) carried out in 27 Brazilian capitals in 2006 were included in the study. The dependent variable was medical diagnosis reporting of diabetes, hypertension and myocardial infarct or stroke. Respondents were grouped into three categories: no disease; one chronic disease; and two or more. The associations between the dependent variable and sociodemographic characteristics, behavioral risk factors (smoking, consumption of fatty meat and whole milk, leisure-time physical inactivity, low fruit and vegetable intake and intake of added salt) and self-perceived health status were assessed in men and women using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Chronic disease reporting was higher among older men and women with lower schooling, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2 and who were on a diet. There was an inverse association between number of risk behaviors and two or more chronic diseases (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54;0.76 among men and OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77;0.97 among women). Those men (OR: 33.61; 95% CI: 15.70;71.93) and women (OR: 13.02; 95% CI: 6.86; 24.73) who self-perceived their health as poor reported more chronic diseases. There was no statistical interaction between self-perceived health status and gender. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse association between number of risk behaviors and reporting of two or more chronic diseases suggests a reverse causality and/or higher survival rates among those who take better care of themselves. Men seem to have poorer perception of their health status compared to women, after adjustment for confounders.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the association between chronic diseases and health risk behaviors and self-perceived health status by gender. METHODS: A total of 39.821 adults (30+ years old) who participated in the system Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção para Doenças Crônicas por Inquérito Telefônico (VIGITEL--Telephone-Based Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases) carried out in 27 Brazilian capitals in 2006 were included in the study. The dependent variable was medical diagnosis reporting of diabetes, hypertension and myocardial infarct or stroke. Respondents were grouped into three categories: no disease; one chronic disease; and two or more. The associations between the dependent variable and sociodemographic characteristics, behavioral risk factors (smoking, consumption of fatty meat and whole milk, leisure-time physical inactivity, low fruit and vegetable intake and intake of added salt) and self-perceived health status were assessed in men and women using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS:Chronic disease reporting was higher among older men and women with lower schooling, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2 and who were on a diet. There was an inverse association between number of risk behaviors and two or more chronic diseases (OR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.54;0.76 among men and OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77;0.97 among women). Those men (OR: 33.61; 95% CI: 15.70;71.93) and women (OR: 13.02; 95% CI: 6.86; 24.73) who self-perceived their health as poor reported more chronic diseases. There was no statistical interaction between self-perceived health status and gender. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse association between number of risk behaviors and reporting of two or more chronic diseases suggests a reverse causality and/or higher survival rates among those who take better care of themselves. Men seem to have poorer perception of their health status compared to women, after adjustment for confounders.
Authors: Karolina Gerreth; Timucin Ari; Wojciech Bednarz; Michal Nowicki; Maria Borysewicz-Lewicka Journal: Med Princ Pract Date: 2019-09-16 Impact factor: 1.927
Authors: Gustavo G Zarini; Joan A Vaccaro; Maria A Canossa Terris; Joel C Exebio; Laura Tokayer; Janet Antwi; Sahar Ajabshir; Amanpreet Cheema; Fatma G Huffman Journal: J Environ Public Health Date: 2014-10-28
Authors: Deborah Carvalho Malta; Max Moura de Oliveira; Silvânia Suely Caribé de Araújo Andrade; Waleska Teixeira Caiaffa; Maria de Fatima Marinho de Souza; Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal Journal: Rev Saude Publica Date: 2017-06-01 Impact factor: 2.106
Authors: Januse Nogueira de Carvalho; Ângelo Giuseppe Roncalli; Marianna de Camargo Cancela; Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paul A Bourne; Samuel McDaniel; Maxwell S Williams; Cynthia Francis; Maureen D Kerr-Campbell; Orville W Beckford Journal: N Am J Med Sci Date: 2010-05
Authors: Ketevan Rtveladze; Tim Marsh; Laura Webber; Fanny Kilpi; David Levy; Wolney Conde; Klim McPherson; Martin Brown Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-11 Impact factor: 3.240