Literature DB >> 19936378

Development of a short olfactory test based on the Connecticut Test (CCCRC).

A Toledano1, C Ruiz, C Navas, C Herráiz, E González, G Rodríguez, A N Galindo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To create a short olfactory test, Connecticut Smell Test (CST), based on the CCCRC (Connecticut Chemosensor and Clinical Research Center).
DESIGN: A prospective patient-based study. SETTINGS: Smell and Taste Outpatient Clinic at the Fundación Hospital Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We compared a short test based on the CCCRC with the Pocket Smell Test (PST) based on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test) UPSIT in 40 patients with nasal polyposis, in order to determine the specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive and negative predictive values. The validity index was 95% with an accuracy rate of 10%. We determined unit cost, the time required to perform the test in the outpatient office and the difficulty to perform the test.
RESULTS: The sensibility was 93.3% and the specificity was 76% with a positive predictive value of 70% and a negative predictive value of 95%. The unitary cost of CST was euro0.65 when it is performed by a doctor. The unitary cost of PST is euro1.76. Our short test took 34 seconds to perform. More than 96% of the patients thought the test was easy to do.
CONCLUSION: Our test is a valid, easy and quick test to be used in patients with nasal polyposis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19936378     DOI: 10.4193/Rhin08.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rhinology        ISSN: 0300-0729            Impact factor:   3.681


  4 in total

1.  Gross Olfaction Before and After Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Carlos Zerrweck; Vannia Castañeda Gallardo; Carmen Calleja; Elisa Sepúlveda; Lizbeth Guilber
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Data-science based analysis of perceptual spaces of odors in olfactory loss.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Alfred Ultsch; Antje Hähner; Vivien Willgeroth; Moustafa Bensafi; Andrea Zaliani; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Characterization of a clinical olfactory test with an artificial nose.

Authors:  David J Yáñez; Adolfo Toledano; Eduardo Serrano; Ana M Martín de Rosales; Francisco B Rodríguez; Pablo Varona
Journal:  Front Neuroeng       Date:  2012-02-02

4.  A machine-learned analysis suggests non-redundant diagnostic information in olfactory subtests.

Authors:  Jörn Lötsch; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  IBRO Rep       Date:  2019-01-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.