OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether Nasal Provocation Tests (NPT) could help in the diagnosis of occupational rhinitis (OR). METHODS: Changes in nasal airway resistance (NAR), measured by posterior rhinomanometry during specific nasal challenge associated with per and post test clinical scores, were compared to a prior probability, based on the patient's history, determined by occupational physicians, in 41 hairdressers and 33 bakers referred for suspected OR. RESULTS: A DeltaNAR >or= 150% defined the positivity of the NPT. DeltaNAR demonstrated 50% sensitivity and a 86% specificity in hairdressers and a 95% sensitivity with 100 % specificity in bakers. DeltaNAR presented significant positive correlations with both per (p = 0.0003, r = 0.48) and post test clinical scores (p < 0.005, r = 0.39). The addition of clinical scores increased the sensitivity to 100% in hairdressers with 81% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The NPT constitutes a safe procedure of nasal reactivity with good levels of sensitivity and specificity in both hairdressers and bakers when nasal resistance and clinical scores are taken into account.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether Nasal Provocation Tests (NPT) could help in the diagnosis of occupational rhinitis (OR). METHODS: Changes in nasal airway resistance (NAR), measured by posterior rhinomanometry during specific nasal challenge associated with per and post test clinical scores, were compared to a prior probability, based on the patient's history, determined by occupational physicians, in 41 hairdressers and 33 bakers referred for suspected OR. RESULTS: A DeltaNAR >or= 150% defined the positivity of the NPT. DeltaNAR demonstrated 50% sensitivity and a 86% specificity in hairdressers and a 95% sensitivity with 100 % specificity in bakers. DeltaNAR presented significant positive correlations with both per (p = 0.0003, r = 0.48) and post test clinical scores (p < 0.005, r = 0.39). The addition of clinical scores increased the sensitivity to 100% in hairdressers with 81% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: The NPT constitutes a safe procedure of nasal reactivity with good levels of sensitivity and specificity in both hairdressers and bakers when nasal resistance and clinical scores are taken into account.
Authors: Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier Journal: World Allergy Organ J Date: 2016-10-12 Impact factor: 4.084