| Literature DB >> 19936185 |
Leandro de Assis Barbosa1, Jose Guilherme Mendes Pereira Caldas, Mario Luiz Conti, Denise Maria Avancini Costa Malheiros, Francisco Ferreira Ramos.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the degree of vascular occlusion, vascular recanalization, and necrosis of the vascular wall caused by polyvinyl alcohol-covered polyvinyl acetate (PVAc) particles compared to trisacryl particles after renal embolization.Entities:
Keywords: Interventional radiology; Kidney; Microspheres; Particles; Therapeutic embolization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19936185 PMCID: PMC2780528 DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322009001100011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Renal angiography - Arterial stage and parenchymal before and after embolization
Figure 2Macroscopic photographs of the right (embolized) kidney and the contralateral (control) kidney immediately after sacrificing the animal (these kidneys are from an animal in the 90-day post-embolization PVAc group)
Figure 3Deformed trisacryl particles and spaces left by them in the vessel lumen
Figure 4PVA particles retain their original shape and occupy all of the space within the vessel
Vascular lumen occlusion related to the time after embolization with either trisacryl (T) or PVAc (P)
| Vascular Lumen Occlusion | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 h | 5 D | 10 D | 30 D | |||||
| T | P | T | P | T | P | T | P | |
| (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=5) | |
| Grade I | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grade II | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
| Grade III | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| P-values (Kruskal-Wallis | p=0.1179 | p=0.0068 | p=0.0037 | Does not apply | ||||
Vascular wall necrosis related to the number of days after embolization with trisacryl (T) or PVAc (P)
| Vascular Wall Necrosis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 h | 5 D | 10 D | ||||
| T | P | T | P | T | P | |
| (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | |
| Grade I | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grade II | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grade III | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| P-values (Kruskal-Wallis) | p=0.027 | p=0.2689 | Does not apply | |||
Recanalization of the vascular lumen related to the number of days after embolization with either trisacryl (T) or PVAc (P)
| Recanalization of Vascular Lumen | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 D | 30 D | 90 D | ||||
| T | P | T | P | T | P | |
| (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=6) | (n=5) | (n=5) | (n=6) | |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Grade I | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 |
| Grade II | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| Grade III | 3 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| P-values (Kruskal-Wallis) | p=0.32 | p=0.4073 | p=0.2352 | |||
Average percentage of parenchymal necrosis related to the time elapsed since embolization with either trisacryl (T) or PVAc (P)
| Parenchymal necrosis (%) | ||
|---|---|---|
| T | P | |
| 48H | 100 | 100 |
| 5D | 91.7 | 97 |
| 10D | 76.7 | 93.3 |
| 30D | 57.5 | 89.2 |
| 90D | 84.2 | 70.8 |