Literature DB >> 19935826

Identifying repeats and transposable elements in sequenced genomes: how to find your way through the dense forest of programs.

E Lerat1.   

Abstract

The production of genome sequences has led to another important advance in their annotation, which is closely linked to the exact determination of their content in terms of repeats, among which are transposable elements (TEs). The evolutionary implications and the presence of coding regions in some TEs can confuse gene annotation, and also hinder the process of genome assembly, making particularly crucial to be able to annotate and classify them correctly in genome sequences. This review is intended to provide an overview as comprehensive as possible of the automated methods currently used to annotate and classify TEs in sequenced genomes. Different categories of programs exist according to their methodology and the repeat, which they can identify. I describe here the main characteristics of the programs, their main goals and the difficulties they can entail. The drawbacks of the different methods are also highlighted to help biologists who are unfamiliar with algorithmic methods to understand this methodology better. Globally, using several different programs and carrying out a cross comparison of their results has the best chance of finding reliable results as any single program. However, this makes it essential to verify the results provided by each program independently. The ideal solution would be to test all programs against the same data set to obtain a true comparison of their actual performance.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19935826     DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  79 in total

1.  In search of lost trajectories: Recovering the diversification of transposable elements.

Authors:  Timothée Flutre; Emmanuelle Permal; Hadi Quesneville
Journal:  Mob Genet Elements       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 2.  Studies of endogenous retroviruses reveal a continuing evolutionary saga.

Authors:  Jonathan P Stoye
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Distribution of Divo in Coffea genomes, a poorly described family of angiosperm LTR-Retrotransposons.

Authors:  Mathilde Dupeyron; Rogerio Fernandes de Souza; Perla Hamon; Alexandre de Kochko; Dominique Crouzillat; Emmanuel Couturon; Douglas Silva Domingues; Romain Guyot
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 4.  Diversity and evolution of transposable elements in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Zoé Joly-Lopez; Thomas E Bureau
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.239

5.  Approaches to Fungal Genome Annotation.

Authors:  Brian J Haas; Qiandong Zeng; Matthew D Pearson; Christina A Cuomo; Jennifer R Wortman
Journal:  Mycology       Date:  2011-10-03

Review 6.  Eukaryote DIRS1-like retrotransposons: an overview.

Authors:  Mathieu Piednoël; Isabelle R Gonçalves; Dominique Higuet; Eric Bonnivard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  The genome sequence of Brucella pinnipedialis B2/94 sheds light on the evolutionary history of the genus Brucella.

Authors:  Stéphane Audic; Magali Lescot; Jean-Michel Claverie; Axel Cloeckaert; Michel S Zygmunt
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Extra Microchromosomes Play Male Determination Role in Polyploid Gibel Carp.

Authors:  Xi-Yin Li; Qi-Ya Zhang; Jun Zhang; Li Zhou; Zhi Li; Xiao-Juan Zhang; Da Wang; Jian-Fang Gui
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosomal distribution and evolution of abundant retrotransposons in plants: gypsy elements in diploid and polyploid Brachiaria forage grasses.

Authors:  Fabíola Carvalho Santos; Romain Guyot; Cacilda Borges do Valle; Lucimara Chiari; Vânia Helena Techio; Pat Heslop-Harrison; André Luís Laforga Vanzela
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Rapid Evolution of Genomic Imprinting in Two Species of the Brassicaceae.

Authors:  Marcelinus R Hatorangan; Benjamin Laenen; Kim A Steige; Tanja Slotte; Claudia Köhler
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 11.277

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.