Literature DB >> 1993523

Strategies for evaluating treatments for major depression in primary care patients.

H C Schulberg1, J L Coulehan, M R Block, C P Scott, S D Imber, J M Perel.   

Abstract

Primary care physicians are being urged to provide patients experiencing a major depression treatments validated with psychiatric patients. The propriety of transferring clinical technologies from one care-giving sector to another is questionable, however, as it has little scientific support. We suggest that clinical trials be initiated so as to expand the available knowledge base. This paper analyzes the methodologic issues involved in pursuing such experimental research and urges that it be conducted despite the possible need for initial design compromises.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1993523     DOI: 10.1016/0163-8343(91)90004-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry        ISSN: 0163-8343            Impact factor:   3.238


  4 in total

Review 1.  Measuring quality of life in patients with depression or anxiety.

Authors:  D Whalley; S P McKenna
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Mental health services research: moving from academia to the community.

Authors:  Christopher M Callahan; Hugh C Hendrie
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.105

3.  A randomized, controlled trial of disease management modules, including telepsychiatric care, for depression in rural primary care.

Authors:  Donald M Hilty; Shayna Marks; Jacob Wegelin; Edward J Callahan; Thomas S Nesbitt
Journal:  Psychiatry (Edgmont)       Date:  2007-02

4.  Designing an intervention to prevent suicide: PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial).

Authors:  M L Bruce; J L Pearson
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.