Literature DB >> 19934805

Facet joint orientation difference between cephalad and caudad portions: a possible cause of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Tomoaki Toyone1, Tomoyuki Ozawa, Koya Kamikawa, Atsuya Watanabe, Keisuke Matsuki, Takeshi Yamashita, Yuichi Wada.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A case-control study. OBJECTIVE.: To measure the orientation of the facet joints at both cephalad and caudad portions and to compare them between patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS, controls). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Several radiologic studies have indicated a correlation between DS and an increased sagittal orientation of the facet joints. However, the orientation of the facet joints have only been measured on 1 axial cut of computed tomography scans and magnetic resonance imaging.
METHODS: Thirty-two patients with DS only at the L4-L5 level were assigned to group-1, and 28 patients with LSS without DS were assigned to group-2. Two computed tomography scans for the cephalad and caudad portions of the facet joint were made for L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels, respectively. Delta facet angle was defined as facet angle (cephalad)-facet angle (caudad).
RESULTS: Facet angles of the cephalad portion were more sagittally oriented (P < 0.001) than those of the caudad portion in group-1. The mean facet angle of the cephalad portion was 72 degrees and that of the caudad portion was 57 degrees at L4-L5. The mean facet angle of the cephalad portion at L4-L5 was greater (P = 0.001) in group-1 (72 degrees ) than in group-2 (62 degrees ). Delta facet angles were significantly greater in group-1 than in group-2. Mean delta facet angle was 15 degrees in group-1 and 2 degrees in group-2 at L4-L5 (P < 0.001), and 4 degrees and 0 degrees , respectively, at L3-L4 (P = 0.046).
CONCLUSION: In this study, we confirmed that the cephalad portion of the facet joints were more sagittally oriented and that the caudad portion of the facet joints were more coronally oriented in patients with DS. These findings were observed not only at L4-L5 but also at the uninvolved L3-L4 level in patients with DS at the L4-L5 level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19934805     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b20158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  13 in total

1.  Motion characteristics of the vertebral segments with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis in elderly patients.

Authors:  Jun Miao; Shaobai Wang; Zongmiao Wan; Won Man Park; Qun Xia; Kirkham Wood; Guoan Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis: a prospective cross-sectional cohort study on the role of weakened anterior abdominal musculature on causation.

Authors:  Robert D Fraser; Francis Brooks; Kris Dalzell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Pelvic retroversion is the key protective mechanism of L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Sibei Li; Zhaomin Zheng; Jiranru Wang; Huafeng Wang; Xiang Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Sagittal spinopelvic alignment and body mass index in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Sébastien Schuller; Yann Philippe Charles; Jean-Paul Steib
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Degenerative spondylolisthesis is associated with low spinal bone density: a comparative study between spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Andersen; Finn B Christensen; Bente L Langdahl; Carsten Ernst; Søren Fruensgaard; Jørgen Østergaard; Jens Langer Andersen; Sten Rasmussen; Bent Niedermann; Kristian Høy; Peter Helmig; Randi Holm; Niels Egund; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Grade 1 spondylolisthesis and interspinous device placement: removal in six patients and analysis of current data.

Authors:  Parker E Bohm; Karen K Anderson; Elizabeth A Friis; Paul M Arnold
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2015-04-02

7.  Facet joint parameters which may act as risk factors for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Ming Yang; Naiguo Wang; Xiaoxin Xu; Yu Zhang; Gang Xu; Yvang Chang; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Facet Tropism and Orientation: Risk Factors for Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Janan Abbas; Natan Peled; Israel Hershkovitz; Kamal Hamoud
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Sacralization may be associated with facet orientation and tropism but not degenerative changes of the lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  Tuba Selcuk Can; Behice Kaniye Yilmaz; Sevim Ozdemir
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-25

10.  Should We Label All Synovial Cysts as Unstable?

Authors:  Arvind G Kulkarni; Shumayou Dutta; Abhilash Dhruv; Anupreet Bassi
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.