CONTEXT: Infants who are very preterm (born < or = 32 weeks of gestation) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (weighing < or = 1500 g) are at risk for poor developmental outcomes. There is increasing evidence that very preterm birth and VLBW have a considerable effect on motor development, although findings are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between very preterm birth and VLBW and motor development. DATA SOURCES: The computerized databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge were used to search for English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 1992 and August 2009. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported motor scores of very preterm and VLBW children without congenital anomalies using 1 of 3 established and widely used motor tests: the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II), the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP). Forty-one articles were identified, encompassing 9653 children. RESULTS: In comparison with term-born peers, very preterm and VLBW children obtained significantly lower scores on all 3 motor tests: BSID-II: d = -0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.96 to -0.80; P < .001), MABC: d = -0.65 (95% CI, -0.70 to -0.60; P < .001), and BOTMP: d = -0.57 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.46; P < .001). Whereas motor outcomes on the BSID-II show a catch-up effect in the first years of development (r = 0.50, P = .01), the results on the MABC demonstrate a nonsignificantly greater deficit with increasing age during elementary school and early adolescence (r = -0.59, P = .07). CONCLUSION: Being born preterm or VLBW is associated with significant motor impairment persisting throughout childhood.
CONTEXT: Infants who are very preterm (born < or = 32 weeks of gestation) and very low birth weight (VLBW) (weighing < or = 1500 g) are at risk for poor developmental outcomes. There is increasing evidence that very preterm birth and VLBW have a considerable effect on motor development, although findings are inconsistent. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between very preterm birth and VLBW and motor development. DATA SOURCES: The computerized databases EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge were used to search for English-language peer-reviewed articles published between January 1992 and August 2009. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they reported motor scores of very preterm and VLBW children without congenital anomalies using 1 of 3 established and widely used motor tests: the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II), the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (MABC), and the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP). Forty-one articles were identified, encompassing 9653 children. RESULTS: In comparison with term-born peers, very preterm and VLBW children obtained significantly lower scores on all 3 motor tests: BSID-II: d = -0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.96 to -0.80; P < .001), MABC: d = -0.65 (95% CI, -0.70 to -0.60; P < .001), and BOTMP: d = -0.57 (95% CI, -0.68 to -0.46; P < .001). Whereas motor outcomes on the BSID-II show a catch-up effect in the first years of development (r = 0.50, P = .01), the results on the MABC demonstrate a nonsignificantly greater deficit with increasing age during elementary school and early adolescence (r = -0.59, P = .07). CONCLUSION: Being born preterm or VLBW is associated with significant motor impairment persisting throughout childhood.
Authors: Hooman Mirzakhani; Rachel S Kelly; Aishwarya P Yadama; Su H Chu; Jessica A Lasky-Su; Augusto A Litonjua; Scott T Weiss Journal: Infant Behav Dev Date: 2020-06-26
Authors: Jane J Lee; Kush Kapur; Ema G Rodrigues; Md Omar Sharif Ibne Hasan; Quazi Quamruzzaman; Robert O Wright; David C Bellinger; David C Christiani; Maitreyi Mazumdar Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Marliese Dion Nist; Rita H Pickler; Tondi M Harrison; Deborah K Steward; Abigail B Shoben Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: M D Wheelock; N C Austin; S Bora; A T Eggebrecht; T R Melzer; L J Woodward; C D Smyser Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 6.556