Literature DB >> 19934127

Accessibility versus confidentiality of information in the emergency department.

H Ayatollahi1, P A Bath, S Goodacre.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the emergency department (ED), clinicians can benefit greatly from having access to information at the point of care. It has been suggested that using computerised information systems could improve the accessibility of information. However, making information accessible, while maintaining confidentiality, is one of the main challenges of implementing information systems. This article presents the ED staff perspectives about the accessibility and confidentiality of information in the ED.
METHOD: The authors undertook a qualitative study in March-April 2007. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews with the ED staff of an ED located in Northern England. In total, 34 interviews were conducted and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed using framework analysis.
RESULTS: The results showed that the ED staff had role-based access to the current information systems, and these systems met only a small part of their information needs. As a result, different sources were used to get access to the needed information. Although the ED staff believed that improving the accessibility of information could be helpful in emergency care services, there were concerns about the confidentiality of information. The confidentiality of information could be threatened--for example, by sharing passwords, misusing patient information or by unauthorised staff having access to patient information.
CONCLUSION: To design a system, the accessibility and confidentiality of information should be addressed in parallel. A balance between these two is needed, as the failure of each of these may negatively influence the use of the system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19934127     DOI: 10.1136/emj.2008.070557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  6 in total

1.  Public attitudes towards genomic risk profiling as a component of routine population screening.

Authors:  S G Nicholls; B J Wilson; S M Craigie; H Etchegary; D Castle; J C Carroll; B K Potter; L Lemyre; J Little
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.166

2.  Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services: What Are the Stakeholders' Perspectives?

Authors:  Mehrnaz Mashoufi; Haleh Ayatollahi; And Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-01-01

3.  Opportunities for Using Health Information Technology for Elderly Care in the Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Ghazal Shagerdi; Haleh Ayatollahi; Morteza Hemmat
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2022-01-01

Review 4.  The role and benefits of accessing primary care patient records during unscheduled care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tom Bowden; Enrico Coiera
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Are prehospital treatment or conveyance decisions affected by an ambulance crew's ability to access a patient's health information?

Authors:  Ollie Zorab; Maria Robinson; Ruth Endacott
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-07

Review 6.  A Review of Data Quality Assessment in Emergency Medical Services.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Mashoufi; Haleh Ayatollahi; Davoud Khorasani-Zavareh
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2018-05-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.