Literature DB >> 19933889

Professionalism and ethics education on relationships and boundaries: psychiatric residents' training preferences.

Maria Lapid1, Christine Moutier, Laura Dunn, Katherine Green Hammond, Laura Weiss Roberts.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Awareness of the privileges and limits of one's role as physician, as well as recognition and respect for the patient as a human being, are central to ethical medical practice. The authors were particularly interested in examining the attitudes and perceived needs of psychiatric residents toward education on professional boundaries and relationships given the heightened current focus on professionalism and ethics.
METHODS: Residents from six psychiatric residencies provided views on professionalism and ethics education on a survey encompassing 10 domains of professionalism. The authors focus on residents' perceived need for education on boundaries in the psychiatrist-patient relationship and in peer-peer and supervisor-trainee interactions.
RESULTS: Respondents (N=134) felt that nine relationship and boundary issues arising during training should receive more education: being asked to work with inadequate supervision, resolving conflicts between attendings and trainees, resident health care, adequately caring for patients while adhering to work-hour guidelines, performing work beyond one's competence, mistreatment of residents, sexual/romantic relationships between faculty and trainees, mistreatment of medical students, and sexual/romantic relationships between residents and medical students (p<0.05 in all cases). In addition, 15 relationship and boundary issues arising during clinical practice were felt to warrant more education: responding to impaired colleagues, coping with mistakes in clinical care, reporting mistakes, balancing personal and professional life, resolving conflicts, writing prescriptions for friends or family, allocation of health care resources, providing medical advice to friends and family, physicians' social responsibilities, interacting with families, medicine as a profession, gender bias, being asked to falsify clinical information, accepting gifts from patients, and personal relationships with patients (p<0.05 in all cases).
CONCLUSION: The authors found a perceived need for more education for psychiatric residents for the majority of topics pertaining to boundaries and relationships. Residents who reported encountering ethical dilemmas more frequently wanted more education on these topics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933889     DOI: 10.1176/appi.ap.33.6.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Psychiatry        ISSN: 1042-9670


  7 in total

1.  Accepting gifts from patients.

Authors:  Andrew Caddell; Lara Hazelton
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Ethics in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Training: What and How Are We Teaching?

Authors:  Arden D Dingle; Venkata Kolli
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-09

3.  Physician-Patient Boundaries: Professionalism Training Using Video Vignettes.

Authors:  Judith Lewis; Scott Allan
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2016-06-10

4.  How do healthcare professionals respond to ethical challenges regarding information management? A review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Cornelius Ewuoso; Susan Hall; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Glob Bioeth       Date:  2021-04-05

5.  Advanced medical students' experiences and views on professionalism at Kuwait University.

Authors:  Dalia Al-Abdulrazzaq; Amani Al-Fadhli; Andleeb Arshad
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Ethics teaching in a medical education environment: preferences for diversity of learning and assessment methods.

Authors:  Tahra AlMahmoud; M Jawad Hashim; Margaret Ann Elzubeir; Frank Branicki
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2017

7.  Informed consent learning: Needs and preferences in medical clerkship environments.

Authors:  Tahra AlMahmoud; M Jawad Hashim; Rabah Almahmoud; Frank Branicki; Margaret Elzubeir
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.