OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to report and compare long-term results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of central venous obstruction in hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hemodialysis patients who underwent successful endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction were retrospectively evaluated. Stenotic lesions greater than 50% or inducing extremity swelling were subject to treatment. The primary treatment was angioplasty, and stent placement was accomplished in angioplasty-resistant obstructions. Angioplasty was the primary treatment of recurrence after stent placement. Additional stenting was reserved for angioplasty-resistant recurrences. RESULTS: One hundred forty-seven veins in 126 patients (63 males, 63 females) between 15 and 82 years old primarily underwent 101 angioplasties and 46 stent placements. The mean follow-up was 22.1 +/- 16.3 (SD) months. The average number of interventions per vein in the stent group (2.7 +/- 2.4 interventions) was significantly higher than that in the angioplasty group (1.5 +/- 1.0 interventions). Primary patency was significantly higher in the angioplasty group (mean, 24.5 +/- 1.7 months) than that in the stent group (mean, 13.4 +/- 2.0 months). Assisted primary patency of the angioplasty group (mean, 31.4 +/- 2.0 months) and that of the stent group (mean, 31.0 +/- 4.7 months) were equivalent. The overall mean primary patency was 21.1 +/- 1.4 months, and the overall mean assisted primary patency was 31.7 +/- 2.5 months. There were no significant differences in patency rates with regard to patient sex, the type of stent used, the vein or veins treated, or the type of lesions. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of central venous obstruction is a safe and effective procedure in hemodialysis patients. Stenting has a significantly lower primary patency rate than angioplasty but adds to the longevity of vein patency in angioplasty-resistant lesions; therefore, stent placement should be considered in angioplasty-resistant lesions.
Authors: Róża Krycińska; Agata Trznadel; Paulina Kuchalska; Michał Lis; Bartosz Dołęga-Kozierowski; Krzysztof Dyś; Stanisław Drelichowski; Wojciech Witkiewicz Journal: Pol J Radiol Date: 2015-05-10