OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of varying volumes and rates of contrast material, use of a saline chaser, and cardiac output on aortic enhancement characteristics in MDCT angiography (MDCTA) using a physiologic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumes of 75, 100, and 125 mL of iopamidol, 370 mg I/mL, were administered at rates of 4, 6, and 8 mL/s. The effect of a saline chaser (50 mL of normal saline, 8 mL/s) was evaluated for each volume and rate combination. Normal, reduced (33% and 50%), and increased (25%) cardiac outputs were simulated. Peak aortic enhancement and duration of peak aortic enhancement were recorded. Analysis of variance models were run with these effects, and the estimated mean levels for the sets of factor combinations were determined. RESULTS: Lowering the volume of contrast material resulted in reduced peak enhancement (example, -56.2 HU [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL) and reduced duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -9.0 seconds [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL). Increasing the rate resulted in increased peak enhancement (example, 104.5 HU [p < 0.0001] with a rate of 8 vs 4 mL/s) and decreased duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -13.0 seconds [p < 0.001]). Use of a saline chaser resulted in increased peak enhancement, and this increase was inversely proportional to contrast material volume. Peak enhancement increased when reduced cardiac output was simulated. Peak enhancement decreased when increased cardiac output was simulated. CONCLUSION: Reducing contrast material volume from 125 to 75 mL, increasing the rate to 6 or 8 mL/s, and use of a saline chaser result in an aortic enhancement profile that better matches the approximately 5-second imaging window possible with 64-MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Even smaller volumes of contrast material may be adequate in patients with reduced cardiac output.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effect of varying volumes and rates of contrast material, use of a saline chaser, and cardiac output on aortic enhancement characteristics in MDCT angiography (MDCTA) using a physiologic phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumes of 75, 100, and 125 mL of iopamidol, 370 mg I/mL, were administered at rates of 4, 6, and 8 mL/s. The effect of a saline chaser (50 mL of normal saline, 8 mL/s) was evaluated for each volume and rate combination. Normal, reduced (33% and 50%), and increased (25%) cardiac outputs were simulated. Peak aortic enhancement and duration of peak aortic enhancement were recorded. Analysis of variance models were run with these effects, and the estimated mean levels for the sets of factor combinations were determined. RESULTS: Lowering the volume of contrast material resulted in reduced peak enhancement (example, -56.2 HU [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL) and reduced duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -9.0 seconds [p < 0.0001] with 75 vs 125 mL). Increasing the rate resulted in increased peak enhancement (example, 104.5 HU [p < 0.0001] with a rate of 8 vs 4 mL/s) and decreased duration of 75% peak enhancement (example, -13.0 seconds [p < 0.001]). Use of a saline chaser resulted in increased peak enhancement, and this increase was inversely proportional to contrast material volume. Peak enhancement increased when reduced cardiac output was simulated. Peak enhancement decreased when increased cardiac output was simulated. CONCLUSION: Reducing contrast material volume from 125 to 75 mL, increasing the rate to 6 or 8 mL/s, and use of a saline chaser result in an aortic enhancement profile that better matches the approximately 5-second imaging window possible with 64-MDCTA of the abdomen and pelvis. Even smaller volumes of contrast material may be adequate in patients with reduced cardiac output.
Authors: Mustafa R Bashir; Paul W Weber; Daniela B Husarik; Laurens E Howle; Rendon C Nelson Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2011-09-07 Impact factor: 2.357