Literature DB >> 19933647

Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Kumaresan Sandrasegaran1, Fatih M Akisik, Chen Lin, Bilal Tahir, Janaki Rajan, Romil Saxena, Alex M Aisen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of liver parenchyma for determining the severity of liver fibrosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study investigated 78 patients who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with 1.5-T MRI and pathologic staging of liver fibrosis based on biopsy. DWI was performed with b values of 50 and 400 s/mm(2). ADCs of liver were measured using 2.0- to 3.0-cm(2) regions of interest in the right and left lobes of the liver; the mean ADC value was used for analysis. Pathologic METAVIR scores for liver fibrosis stage were used as a reference standard.
RESULTS: The mean ADC values for fibrosis pathologically staged using the METAVIR classification system as F0 (n = 11), F1 (n = 16), F2 (n = 10), F3 (n = 14), and F4 (n = 27) were 125.9, 105.0, 104.5, 103.2, and 99.1 x 10(-5) s/mm(2), respectively. The correlation between the ADC values and the degree of liver fibrosis was moderate (Spearman's test, rho = -0.36). There was a significant difference in ADC values between patients with nonfibrotic liver (F0) and those with cirrhotic liver (F4) (p = 0.008). The best cutoff ADC value to distinguish between these groups was 118 x 10(-5) s/mm(2). However, ADC values were not useful for differentiating viral hepatitis patients with F2 fibrosis or higher from those with a lower degree of fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.66) or for differentiating low-stage fibrosis in all patients from high-stage fibrosis in all patients (AUC = 0.54).
CONCLUSION: The ADCs in cirrhotic livers are significantly lower than those in nonfibrotic livers. However, ADC values measured using the current generation of scanners are not reliable enough to replace liver biopsy for staging hepatic fibrosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933647     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  57 in total

1.  Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Ayse Ahsen Bakan; Ercan Inci; Selim Bakan; Suut Gokturk; Tan Cimilli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Prediction of liver cirrhosis, using diagnostic imaging tools.

Authors:  Suk Keu Yeom; Chang Hee Lee; Sang Hoon Cha; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-18

3.  Percutaneous liver biopsy in Fontan patients.

Authors:  Abhay Srinivasan; Anthony K Guzman; Elizabeth B Rand; Jack Rychik; David J Goldberg; Pierre A Russo; Anne Marie Cahill
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-11-30

4.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weon Jang; Seongil Jo; Ji Soo Song; Hong Pil Hwang; Seong-Hun Kim
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-26

5.  Pathological and MR-DWI study of the acute hepatic injury model after stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Quan-Liang Shang; En-Hua Xiao; Qi-Chang Zhou; Jian-Guang Luo; Hai-Jun Wu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for the differentiation of malignant from benign strictures in the periampullary region.

Authors:  Nam Kyung Lee; Suk Kim; Hyung Il Seo; Dong Uk Kim; Hyun Young Woo; Tae Un Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Mohamed Khashaba; Ahmed Abdalla; Mohamed Bayomy; Tarek Barakat
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 8.  Paediatric chronic liver diseases: how to investigate and follow up? Role of imaging in the diagnosis of fibrosis.

Authors:  Danièle Pariente; Stéphanie Franchi-Abella
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

Review 9.  Putting it all together: established and emerging MRI techniques for detecting and measuring liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Alexander Miethke; Eric Diaz; Stavra A Xanthakos; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

10.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver with multiple b values: effect of diffusion gradient polarity and breathing acquisition on image quality and intravoxel incoherent motion parameters--a pilot study.

Authors:  Hadrien A Dyvorne; Nicola Galea; Thomas Nevers; M Isabel Fiel; David Carpenter; Edmund Wong; Matthew Orton; Andre de Oliveira; Thorsten Feiweier; Marie-Louise Vachon; James S Babb; Bachir Taouli
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 11.105

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.