BACKGROUND: Peculiar aspects of Chagas cardiomyopathy raise concerns about efficacy and safety of sympathetic blockade. We studied the influence of beta-blockers in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined REMADHE trial and grouped patients according to etiology (Chagas versus non-Chagas) and beta-blocker therapy. Primary end point was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. Altogether 456 patients were studied; 27 (5.9%) were submitted to heart transplantation and 202 (44.3%) died. Chagas etiology was present in 68 (14.9%) patients; they had lower body mass index (24.1+/-4.1 versus 26.3+/-5.1, P=0.001), smaller end-diastolic left ventricle diameter (6.7+/-1.0 mm versus 7.0+/-0.9 mm, P=0.001), smaller proportion of beta-blocker therapy (35.8% versus 68%, P<0.001), and higher proportion of spironolactone therapy (74.6% versus 57.8%, P=0.003). Twenty-four (35.8%) patients with Chagas disease were under beta-blocker therapy and had lower serum sodium (136.6+/-3.1 versus 138.4+/-3.1 mEqs, P=0.05) and lower body mass index (22.5+/-3.3 versus 24.9+/-4.3, P=0.03) compared with those who received beta-blockers. Survival was lower in patients with Chagas heart disease as compared with other etiologies. When only patients under beta-blockers were considered, the survival of patients with Chagas disease was similar to that of other etiologies. The survival of patients with beta-blockers was higher than that of patients without beta-blockers. In Cox regression model, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (hazard ratio, 1.78; CI, 1.15 to 2.76; P=0.009) and beta-blockers (hazard ratio, 0.37; CI, 0.14 to 0.97; P=0.044) were associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that beta-blockers may have beneficial effects on survival of patients with heart failure and Chagas heart disease and warrants further investigation in a prospective, randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registration- clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00505050.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Peculiar aspects of Chagas cardiomyopathy raise concerns about efficacy and safety of sympathetic blockade. We studied the influence of beta-blockers in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined REMADHE trial and grouped patients according to etiology (Chagas versus non-Chagas) and beta-blocker therapy. Primary end point was all-cause mortality or heart transplantation. Altogether 456 patients were studied; 27 (5.9%) were submitted to heart transplantation and 202 (44.3%) died. Chagas etiology was present in 68 (14.9%) patients; they had lower body mass index (24.1+/-4.1 versus 26.3+/-5.1, P=0.001), smaller end-diastolic left ventricle diameter (6.7+/-1.0 mm versus 7.0+/-0.9 mm, P=0.001), smaller proportion of beta-blocker therapy (35.8% versus 68%, P<0.001), and higher proportion of spironolactone therapy (74.6% versus 57.8%, P=0.003). Twenty-four (35.8%) patients with Chagas disease were under beta-blocker therapy and had lower serum sodium (136.6+/-3.1 versus 138.4+/-3.1 mEqs, P=0.05) and lower body mass index (22.5+/-3.3 versus 24.9+/-4.3, P=0.03) compared with those who received beta-blockers. Survival was lower in patients with Chagas heart disease as compared with other etiologies. When only patients under beta-blockers were considered, the survival of patients with Chagas disease was similar to that of other etiologies. The survival of patients with beta-blockers was higher than that of patients without beta-blockers. In Cox regression model, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter (hazard ratio, 1.78; CI, 1.15 to 2.76; P=0.009) and beta-blockers (hazard ratio, 0.37; CI, 0.14 to 0.97; P=0.044) were associated with better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that beta-blockers may have beneficial effects on survival of patients with heart failure and Chagas heart disease and warrants further investigation in a prospective, randomized trial. Clinical Trial Registration- clinicaltrials.gov. Identifier: NCT00505050.
Authors: Lilian Melo; Ivo Santana Caldas; Maíra Araújo Azevedo; Karolina Ribeiro Gonçalves; Alvaro Fernando da Silva do Nascimento; Vivian Paulino Figueiredo; Lívia de Figueiredo Diniz; Wanderson Geraldo de Lima; Rosália Moraes Torres; Maria Terezinha Bahia; André Talvani Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: Herbert B Tanowitz; Fabiana S Machado; David C Spray; Joel M Friedman; Oren S Weiss; Jose N Lora; Jyothi Nagajyothi; Diego N Moraes; Nisha Jain Garg; Maria Carmo P Nunes; Antonio Luiz P Ribeiro Journal: Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther Date: 2015-10-23
Authors: Silvia M Ayub-Ferreira; Sandrigo Mangini; Victor S Issa; Fátima D Cruz; Fernando Bacal; Guilherme V Guimarães; Paulo R Chizzola; Germano E Conceição-Souza; Fabiana G Marcondes-Braga; Edimar A Bocchi Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2013-04-25
Authors: Diego F Dávila; Jose H Donis; Gabriela Arata de Bellabarba; Vanesa Villarroel; Francisco Sanchez; Lisbeth Berrueta; Siham Salmen; Barbara Das Neves Journal: Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis Date: 2012-10-02