Mikael Svensson1, Curt Hagquist. 1. Department of Economics, Swedish Business School, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden. mikael.svensson@oru.se
Abstract
AIM: This article compares adolescent alcohol and illicit drug use among first- and second-generation immigrants from Nordic, non-Nordic European and non-European countries with that of the native Swedish majority population. METHODS: Using data from a 2005 survey, multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed on a sample of 13,070 adolescents. The survey was conducted in three Swedish regions containing 24 municipalities. RESULTS: Second-generation immigrants from Nordic countries were more likely to use alcohol and to binge drink, while first generation immigrants from non-European countries were less likely to; this difference is mainly explained by the relatively low use by girls from non-European countries. All immigrant groups were more likely to use illicit drugs than were the majority population. The highest drug use was found among first-generation Nordic immigrants and non-European immigrants. Consumption patterns among second-generation immigrants were more similar to those of the Swedish majority population, implying more alcohol use and less illicit drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive policy for alcohol use should target Nordic immigrants in Sweden (second generation), while preventive policy for drug use, which is a more general immigrant phenomena, should mostly target both Nordic and non-European immigrants.
AIM: This article compares adolescent alcohol and illicit drug use among first- and second-generation immigrants from Nordic, non-Nordic European and non-European countries with that of the native Swedish majority population. METHODS: Using data from a 2005 survey, multilevel logistic regression analysis was performed on a sample of 13,070 adolescents. The survey was conducted in three Swedish regions containing 24 municipalities. RESULTS: Second-generation immigrants from Nordic countries were more likely to use alcohol and to binge drink, while first generation immigrants from non-European countries were less likely to; this difference is mainly explained by the relatively low use by girls from non-European countries. All immigrant groups were more likely to use illicit drugs than were the majority population. The highest drug use was found among first-generation Nordic immigrants and non-European immigrants. Consumption patterns among second-generation immigrants were more similar to those of the Swedish majority population, implying more alcohol use and less illicit drug use. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive policy for alcohol use should target Nordic immigrants in Sweden (second generation), while preventive policy for drug use, which is a more general immigrant phenomena, should mostly target both Nordic and non-European immigrants.
Authors: Victoria D Ojeda; Angela M Robertson; Sarah P Hiller; Remedios Lozada; Wayne Cornelius; Lawrence A Palinkas; Carlos Magis-Rodriguez; Steffanie A Strathdee Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Hélio Manhica; Karl Gauffin; Ylva B Almquist; Mikael Rostila; Lisa Berg; Ainhoa Rodríguez García de Cortázar; Anders Hjern Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Essi Salama; Solja Niemelä; Jaana Suvisaari; Tiina Laatikainen; Päivikki Koponen; Anu E Castaneda Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Essi S Salama; Anu E Castaneda; Eero Lilja; Jaana Suvisaari; Shadia Rask; Tiina Laatikainen; Solja Niemelä Journal: Addiction Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 6.526