Literature DB >> 19933081

A phase II randomized crossover study of liposomal doxorubicin versus weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer.

Denise A Yardley1, Howard A Burris, David R Spigel, Bobby L Clark, Elizabeth Vazquez, Dianna Shipley, John Barton, Dana Thompson, Ignacio Montes, F Anthony Greco, John D Hainsworth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aim to compare the efficacy and toxicity of liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel as first-line treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who had received no previous chemotherapy for MBC were eligible. Previous hormonal therapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were allowed. Patients were randomized to receive liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) intravenously [I.V.] every 28 days or weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) I.V. days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 28 days. Patients with objective response or stable disease after 2 cycles continued treatment until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. At progression, patients were allowed to cross over to the other regimen. The trial was designed to detect a true difference of 10% in response rate with an 80% power.
RESULTS: Between March 2001 and July 2007, 102 patients were randomized. The 2 groups had similar demographics; 68% of patients had received previous adjuvant chemotherapy. Liposomal doxorubicin and weekly docetaxel produced similar objective response rates (28% vs. 31%), disease control rates (48% vs. 44%), and progression-free survival (6.5 months vs. 5.5 months). Both agents were well tolerated. Both agents produced crossover responses as second-line treatment (liposomal doxorubicin, 35%; weekly docetaxel, 14%).
CONCLUSION: Liposomal doxorubicin is well tolerated and has activity similar to weekly docetaxel in the first-line treatment of patients with MBC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19933081     DOI: 10.3816/CBC.2009.n.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1526-8209            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Davina Ghersi; Melina L Willson; Matthew Ming Ki Chan; John Simes; Emma Donoghue; Nicholas Wilcken
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-06-10

Review 2.  Efficacy and Cardiotoxicity of Liposomal Doxorubicin-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Ten Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Meiyuan Xing; Feifei Yan; Sufen Yu; Peng Shen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A process for assessing the feasibility of a network meta-analysis: a case study of everolimus in combination with hormonal therapy versus chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon Cope; Jie Zhang; Stephen Saletan; Brielan Smiechowski; Jeroen P Jansen; Peter Schmid
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  Targeting invadopodia-mediated breast cancer metastasis by using ABL kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Tomer Meirson; Alessandro Genna; Nikola Lukic; Tetiana Makhnii; Joel Alter; Ved P Sharma; Yarong Wang; Abraham O Samson; John S Condeelis; Hava Gil-Henn
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-24

5.  Multicenter study of primary systemic therapy with docetaxel, cyclophosphamide and trastuzumab for HER2-positive operable breast cancer: the JBCRG-10 study.

Authors:  Takayuki Ueno; Norikazu Masuda; Nobuaki Sato; Shoichiro Ohtani; Jun Yamamura; Nobuki Matsunami; Masahiro Kashiwaba; Toshimi Takano; Masato Takahashi; Koji Kaneko; Shinji Ohno; Satoshi Morita; Masakazu Toi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.019

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.