| Literature DB >> 19932815 |
Wen-Hsien Tsai1, Hung-Yi Chuang, Ho-Hsien Chen, Joh-Jong Huang, Hwi-Chang Chen, Shou-Hsun Cheng, Tzou-Chi Huang.
Abstract
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and dispersive micro-solid-phase extraction (DMSPE) are two simple and low-cost sample preparation methods for liquid samples. In this work, these two methods were applied to solid tissue sample for the determination of seven quinolones by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). After the homogenization of the swine muscle with acetonitrile and salt-promoted partitioning, small amounts of the extract were used for the DLLME and DMSPE methods. In the DLLME approach, the target analytes in the extraction solvent were rapidly extracted into a small volume of dichloromethane for drying and the residue was reconstituted for HPLC-DAD analysis. In the DMSPE approach, the target analytes in the extraction solvent were trapped by dispersive silica-based PSA (primary and secondary amine) sorbents and desorbed into a small amount of desorption solution for HPLC-DAD analysis. Under the optimal conditions, relative recoveries were determined for swine muscle spiked 50-200 microg kg(-1) and quantification was achieved by matrix-matched calibration. The calibration curves of seven quinolones showed linearity with a correlation coefficient value above 0.998 for both approaches. Relative recoveries ranged from 93.0 to 104.7% and from 95.5 to 111.0% for DLLME and DMSPE, respectively. Limits of detection (LODs) ranged from 5.6 to 23.8 microg kg(-1) and from 7.5 to 26.3 microg kg(-1) for DLLME and DMSPE, respectively.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19932815 DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.10.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Chim Acta ISSN: 0003-2670 Impact factor: 6.558