Literature DB >> 19932705

Reproductive skew theory unified: the general bordered tug-of-war model.

Sheng-Feng Shen1, H Kern Reeve.   

Abstract

Reproductive skew has been identified as a major dimension along which animal societies vary. Two major kinds of reproductive skew models are transactional models, which explain the distribution of reproduction within animal societies as the result of reproductive payments exchanged among group members with differential leverage, and tug-of-war models, in which the reproductive shares are determined by costly 'tugs-of-war'. These two models have recently been synthesized to yield the mutual-pay, bordered tug-of-war model. In this paper, we extend the latter, show its evolutionary stability, and demonstrate that the generalized model yields four sub-models, namely the mutual-pay, alpha-pay, beta-pay, and pure tug-of-war. The alpha-pay sub-model turns out to closely resemble the original "concessions" transactional skew model, and the beta-pay sub-model turns out to have properties similar to the "restraint" transactional skew model. Thus, the general model unifies the four major models of reproductive skew and is rich in its predictions, as each sub-model exhibits different qualitative and quantitative relationships between reproductive skew or intra-group conflict and the ecological and genetic factors that determine skew and conflict. The conditions favoring transitions among these sub-models also are precisely predicted by the general model. The general model accommodates data from acorn woodpeckers and primitively eusocial bees potentially can account for many of the highly varied empirical findings on reproductive skew. We suggest further research that focuses on (1) determining which model is suitable for certain species and (2) understanding why and how various social animals resolve their breeding conflict by different conflict resolution mechanisms. 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932705     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  10 in total

1.  Longevity suppresses conflict in animal societies.

Authors:  Markus Port; Michael A Cant
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  What do territory owners defend against?

Authors:  Martin Hinsch; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Evolutionarily stable investments in recognition systems explain patterns of discrimination failure and success.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; H Kern Reeve
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Concessions of an alpha male? Cooperative defence and shared reproduction in multi-male primate groups.

Authors:  Noah Snyder-Mackler; Susan C Alberts; Thore J Bergman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  From inter-group conflict to inter-group cooperation: insights from social insects.

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Jessica L Barker; Elva J H Robinson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Social status drives social relationships in groups of unrelated female rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Noah Snyder-Mackler; Jordan N Kohn; Luis B Barreiro; Zachary P Johnson; Mark E Wilson; Jenny Tung
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Stable eusociality via maternal manipulation when resistance is costless.

Authors:  M González-Forero
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Long-term evolutionary conflict, Sisyphean arms races, and power in Fisher's geometric model.

Authors:  Trey J Scott; David C Queller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  A Game-Theoretical Winner and Loser Model of Dominance Hierarchy Formation.

Authors:  Klodeta Kura; Mark Broom; Anne Kandler
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 1.758

10.  Asymmetry within social groups: division of labour and intergroup competition.

Authors:  J L Barker; K J Loope; H K Reeve
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.