Literature DB >> 19932417

Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Colleen D McDermott1, Douglass S Hale.   

Abstract

Abdominal correction of pelvic organ prolapse remains a viable option for patients and surgeons. The transition from open procedures to less invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries is evident in the literature. This article reviews the surgical options available for pelvic organ prolapse repair and their reported outcomes. Procedures reviewed include apical support (sacral, uterosacral, and others), and abdominal anterior and posterior vaginal wall support. Long-term follow-up and appropriately designed studies will further help direct surgeons in deciding which approach to incorporate into their practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932417     DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2009.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8545            Impact factor:   2.844


  7 in total

1.  Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal-vaginal posterior graft attachment.

Authors:  Colleen D McDermott; Jean Park; Colin L Terry; Patrick J Woodman; Douglass S Hale
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS).

Authors:  E R Mueller; K Kenton; C Tarnay; L Brubaker; A Rosenman; B Smith; K Stroupe; C Bresee; A Pantuck; P Schulam; J T Anger
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Douglass S Hale; Vincent R Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  David R Ellington; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.190

6.  Robotic sacrocolpopexy: an observational experience at mayoclinic, USA.

Authors:  Krishna Kavita Ramavath; Pp Srinivasa Murthy
Journal:  J Gynecol Endosc Surg       Date:  2011-01

7.  Perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of abdominal sacrocolpopexy, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy, and laparoscopic pectopexy for apical prolapse.

Authors:  Alper Biler; I Egemen Ertas; Gokhan Tosun; Ismet Hortu; Unal Turkay; Ozge E Gultekin; Gulfem Igci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.541

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.