Literature DB >> 19932073

Comparison of DNA extraction methods for multiplex polymerase chain reaction.

Triin Viltrop1, Kaarel Krjutskov, Priit Palta, Andres Metspalu.   

Abstract

We compared six DNA extraction methods for obtaining DNA from whole blood and saliva for use in multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays. The aim was to evaluate saliva sampling as an alternative to blood sampling to obtain DNA for molecular diagnostics, genetic genealogy, and research purposes. The DNA quantity, DNA purity (A(260/280)), PCR inhibition ratio, and mitochondrial DNA/genomic DNA ratio were measured to compare the extraction methods. The different extraction methods resulted in variable DNA quantity and purity, but there were no significant differences in the efficiency of multiplex PCR and oligomicroarray signals after single-base extension on the arrayed primer extension 2 (APEX-2). Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932073     DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Biochem        ISSN: 0003-2697            Impact factor:   3.365


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays.

Authors:  Linda Koshy; A L Anju; S Harikrishnan; V R Kutty; V T Jissa; Irin Kurikesu; Parvathy Jayachandran; A Jayakumaran Nair; A Gangaprasad; G M Nair; P R Sudhakaran
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Human DNA extraction from whole saliva that was fresh or stored for 3, 6 or 12 months using five different protocols.

Authors:  Thais Francini Garbieri; Daniel Thomas Brozoski; Thiago José Dionísio; Carlos Ferreira Santos; Lucimara Teixeira das Neves
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Epidemiology and genetics of common mental disorders in the general population: the PEGASUS-Murcia project.

Authors:  Fernando Navarro-Mateu; Mj Tormo; G Vilagut; J Alonso; G Ruíz-Merino; T Escámez; D Salmerón; J Júdez; S Martínez; C Navarro
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  The identification of sympatric cryptic free-living nematode species in the Antarctic intertidal.

Authors:  Matthew R Lee; Cristian B Canales-Aguirre; Daniela Nuñez; Karla Pérez; Crisitan E Hernández; Antonio Brante
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  3D-Printed Modular Microfluidic Device Enabling Preconcentrating Bacteria and Purifying Bacterial DNA in Blood for Improving the Sensitivity of Molecular Diagnostics.

Authors:  Abdurhaman Teyib Abafogi; Jaewon Kim; Jinyeop Lee; Merem Omer Mohammed; Danny van Noort; Sungsu Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.576

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.