Literature DB >> 19932063

Bicruciate ligament lesions and dislocation of the knee: mechanisms and classification.

S Boisgard1, G Versier, S Descamps, S Lustig, C Trojani, P Rosset, D Saragaglia, P Neyret.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the mechanisms of bicruciate lesions and dislocation of the knee enables analysis and classification in terms of injuries' location and type, guiding surgery and facilitating assessment. Careful history taking and clinical examination shed light on the mechanism involved, but exact identification of the lesion further requires examination under anesthesia and static and dynamic X-rays and MRI, which together enable precise determination of lesion type and location. There are two types of mechanism: gaping, causing ligament tear; and translation, causing detachment. When a single mechanism is involved, the lesion is said to be "simple". Simple gaping causes bicruciate lesions without medial, lateral or posterior dislocation. Simple translation causes pure anterior or posterior dislocation. Gaping and translation may also occur in combination, causing dislocation with peripheral tearing. There are two types of classification: descriptive, based on X-ray findings--i.e., static classification; and physiopathological, based on clinical and dynamic X-ray findings. MRI further explores ligament detachment and bone lesions that are inaccessible to clinical and conventional X-ray examination. Physiopathological assessment-based techniques enable surgical procedure to be refined, defining the surgical approach according to lesion location and differentiating between lesions requiring repair (tears) and those with a good likelihood of spontaneous healing (capsuloperiosteal detachment). The classification advocated here is largely inspired by that of Neyret and Rongieras, extended to include dislocation with single bicruciate ligament lesion. It covers peripheral lesions completely, specifying type (tear or detachment) and including all bicruciate lesions as well as dislocations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19932063     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  6 in total

Review 1.  Multiligamentous injuries and knee dislocations.

Authors:  Lana H Gimber; Luke R Scalcione; Andrew Rowan; Jolene C Hardy; David M Melville; Mihra S Taljanovic
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 2.  Management of knee dislocation prior to ligament reconstruction: What is the current evidence? Update of a universal treatment algorithm.

Authors:  Alexander Maslaris; Olaf Brinkmann; Matthias Bungartz; Christian Krettek; Michael Jagodzinski; Emmanouil Liodakis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-22

3.  Incidence and type of meniscal tears in multilligament injured knees.

Authors:  Chloé Labarre; Seong Hwan Kim; Nicolas Pujol
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 4.  Classifications in Brief: The Schenck Classification of Knee Dislocations.

Authors:  Collin Patrick Goebel; Christopher Domes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.755

5.  Demographics and Injuries Associated With Knee Dislocation: A Prospective Review of 303 Patients.

Authors:  Gilbert Moatshe; Grant J Dornan; Sverre Løken; Tom C Ludvigsen; Robert F LaPrade; Lars Engebretsen
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-22

6.  CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER TWO-STAGE BICRUCIATE KNEE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Mauro Mituso Inada; Sérgio Rocha Piedade
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.