Anna V Song1, Stanton A Glantz, Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher. 1. University of California, Merced, School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, Psychological Sciences, Merced, California 95343, USA. anna.song@ucmerced.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To directly test whether perceptions of second-hand smoke risks deter adolescent smoking initiation. METHODS: A longitudinal survey design was utilized in this study. Baseline surveys measuring perceptions of tobacco-related risks and smoking behaviors were administered to 395 high school students, with three follow-up assessments every 6 months. RESULTS: Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks and parental second-hand smoke risks significantly deterred adolescent smoking initiation. Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.42-0.94) for each quartile increase in perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks. Adolescents who provided the highest estimates of risks for personal second-hand smoke were 0.25 as likely to smoke as adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. Perceptions of parental second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.64 (95% CI=0.43-0.93) for each quartile increase. Adolescents who perceived the highest estimates of risks associated with parental second-hand smoke were 0.26 as likely to smoke in the future compared to adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. These effects are over three times as large as a smoking peer's influence on a nonsmoking adolescents' risk for smoking initiation, odds ratio [OR]=1.18 (95% CI=1.02-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent perceptions of risks of second-hand smoke are strongly associated with smoking initiation. Encouraging adolescents to express their objections to second-hand smoke, as well as encouraging parents to create smoke-free homes, may be powerful tobacco control strategies against adolescent smoking.
PURPOSE: To directly test whether perceptions of second-hand smoke risks deter adolescent smoking initiation. METHODS: A longitudinal survey design was utilized in this study. Baseline surveys measuring perceptions of tobacco-related risks and smoking behaviors were administered to 395 high school students, with three follow-up assessments every 6 months. RESULTS: Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks and parental second-hand smoke risks significantly deterred adolescent smoking initiation. Perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.42-0.94) for each quartile increase in perceptions of personal second-hand smoke risks. Adolescents who provided the highest estimates of risks for personal second-hand smoke were 0.25 as likely to smoke as adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. Perceptions of parental second-hand smoke risks reduced the odds of smoking by a factor of 0.64 (95% CI=0.43-0.93) for each quartile increase. Adolescents who perceived the highest estimates of risks associated with parental second-hand smoke were 0.26 as likely to smoke in the future compared to adolescents who provided the lowest estimates of risk. These effects are over three times as large as a smoking peer's influence on a nonsmoking adolescents' risk for smoking initiation, odds ratio [OR]=1.18 (95% CI=1.02-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: Adolescent perceptions of risks of second-hand smoke are strongly associated with smoking initiation. Encouraging adolescents to express their objections to second-hand smoke, as well as encouraging parents to create smoke-free homes, may be powerful tobacco control strategies against adolescent smoking.
Authors: Catherine A Martin; Thomas H Kelly; Mary Kay Rayens; Bethanie R Brogli; Allen Brenzel; W Jackson Smith; Hatim A Omar Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Matthew C Farrelly; Kevin C Davis; M Lyndon Haviland; Peter Messeri; Cheryl G Healton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jie Wu Weiss; Steven Cen; Darleen V Schuster; Jennifer B Unger; C Anderson Johnson; Michele Mouttapa; William S Schreiner; Tess Boley Cruz Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Debra H Bernat; Darin J Erickson; Rachel Widome; Cheryl L Perry; Jean L Forster Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2008-05-29 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Lucy Popova; Brittany D Linde; Zoran Bursac; G Wayne Talcott; Mary V Modayil; Melissa A Little; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz; Robert C Klesges Journal: Tob Control Date: 2015-10-19 Impact factor: 7.552
Authors: Daniel Owusu; Hadii M Mamudu; Candice Collins; Crystal Robertson; Liang Wang; Boghozian Rafie; Mary Ann Littleton Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2019
Authors: Ashley H Clawson; Jody S Nicholson; Michael J McDermott; James L Klosky; Vida L Tyc Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2014-09-06 Impact factor: 1.812