Literature DB >> 19931802

Magnetic resonance imaging-based semiquantitative and quantitative assessment in osteoarthritis.

Frank W Roemer1, Felix Eckstein, Ali Guermazi.   

Abstract

Whole organ magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based semiquantitative (SQ) assessment of knee osteoarthritis (OA), based on reliable scoring methods and expert reading, has become a powerful research tool in OA. SQ morphologic scoring has been applied to large observational cross-sectional and longitudinal epidemiologic studies as well as interventional clinical trials. SQ whole organ scoring analyzes all joint structures that are potentially relevant as surrogate outcome measures of OA and potential disease modification, including cartilage, subchondral bone, osteophytes, intra- and periarticular ligaments, menisci, synovial lining, cysts, and bursae. Resources needed for SQ scoring rely on the MRI protocol, image quality, experience of the expert readers, method of documentation, and the individual scoring system that will be applied. The first part of this article discusses the different available OA whole organ scoring systems, focusing on MRI of the knee, and also reviews alternative approaches. Rheumatologists are made aware of artifacts and differential diagnoses when applying any of the SQ scoring systems. The second part focuses on quantitative approaches in OA, particularly measurement of (subregional) cartilage loss. This approach allows one to determine minute changes that occur relatively homogeneously across cartilage structures and that are not apparent to the naked eye. To this end, the cartilage surfaces need to be segmented by trained users using specialized software. Measurements of knee cartilage loss based on water-excitation spoiled gradient recalled echo acquisition in the steady state, fast low-angle shot, or double-echo steady-state imaging sequences reported a 1% to 2% decrease in cartilage thickness annually, and a high degree of spatial heterogeneity of cartilage thickness changes in femorotibial subregions between subjects. Risk factors identified by quantitative measurement technology included a high body mass index, meniscal extrusion and meniscal tears, knee malalignment, advanced radiographic OA grade, bone marrow alterations, and focal cartilage lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931802     DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2009.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-857X            Impact factor:   2.670


  21 in total

1.  Association of magnetic resonance imaging-based knee cartilage T2 measurements and focal knee lesions with knee pain: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Gabby B Joseph; Ahilan Arulanandan; Lorenzo Nardo; Warapat Virayavanich; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Michael C Nevitt; John Lynch; Charles E McCulloch; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of subchondral bone marrow lesions in association with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Li Xu; Daichi Hayashi; Frank W Roemer; David T Felson; Ali Guermazi
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 5.532

3.  Imaging of Osteoarthritis in Geriatric Patients.

Authors:  Alexandra S Gersing; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Curr Radiol Rep       Date:  2016-01-02

4.  Use magnetic resonance imaging to assess articular cartilage.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Wang; Anita E Wluka; Graeme Jones; Changhai Ding; Flavia M Cicuttini
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Quantitative assessment of mobile protein levels in human knee synovial fluid: feasibility of chemical exchange saturation transfer (proteinCEST) MRI of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Guang Jia; Yukihisa Takayama; David C Flanigan; Christopher C Kaeding; Jinyuan Zhou; Ajit Chaudhari; Daniel Clark; Steffen Sammet; Jiachao Liang; Seongjin Choi; Michael V Knopp
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Knee cartilage T2 characteristics and evolution in relation to morphologic abnormalities detected at 3-T MR imaging: a longitudinal study of the normal control cohort from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Judong Pan; Jean-Baptiste Pialat; Tom Joseph; Daniel Kuo; Gabby B Joseph; Michael C Nevitt; Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Initial results on development and application of statistical atlas of femoral cartilage in osteoarthritis to determine sex differences in structure: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Hussain Z Tameem; Siamak Ardekani; Leanne Seeger; Paul Thompson; Usha S Sinha
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 8.  The impact of MRI on the clinical management of inflammatory arthritides.

Authors:  Ulrich Weber; Mikkel Østergaard; Robert G W Lambert; Walter P Maksymowych
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Quantitative versus semiquantitative MR imaging of cartilage in blood-induced arthritic ankles: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Andrea S Doria; Ningning Zhang; Bjorn Lundin; Pamela Hilliard; Carina Man; Ruth Weiss; Gary Detzler; Victor Blanchette; Rahim Moineddin; Felix Eckstein; Marshall S Sussman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-02-13

10.  How reliable is MRI in diagnosing cartilaginous lesions in patients with first and recurrent lateral patellar dislocations?

Authors:  Lars V von Engelhardt; Marthina Raddatz; Bertil Bouillon; Gunter Spahn; Andreas Dàvid; Patrick Haage; Thomas K Lichtinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.