Literature DB >> 19931154

Effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on indocyanine green elimination assessed with LIMON to patients with early septic shock: a pilot study.

Dilek Memiş1, M Kargi, N Sut.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aimed to select the sedative drug with the least impact on hepatic blood flow in sedation-administered patients. In our study, we aimed to establish whether dexmedetomidine and propofol affect liver function during early septic shock. The hepatic blood flow is evaluated by the transcutaneous assessment of indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate (ICG-PDR) in critically ill patients.
METHODS: Forty early septic shock patients were included in the study and administered either the loading dose infusion of propofol (n = 20, group P) of 1 mg/kg over 15 minutes followed by a maintenance dose of 1 to 3 mg/kg per hour (n = 20, group P), or a loading dose of dexmedetomidine 1 microg/kg over 10 minutes followed by a maintenance of 0.2 to 2.5 microgg/kg per hour (n = 20, group D) (24-hour infusion). Indocyanine green (ICG) elimination tests were conducted concurrently using the noninvasive liver function monitoring system (LiMON; Pulsion Medical Systems, Munich, Germany). A dose of 0.3 mg/kg of ICG was given through a cubital fossa vein as a bolus and immediately flushed with 10 mL of normal saline. We calculated ICG-PDR. Indocyanine green plasma disappearance rate measurements were obtained at baseline (before start of the propofol or dexmedetomidine infusion) and were repeated at the 24th hour. Biochemical and hemodynamic parameters and ICG-PDR were recorded before start of the study and at 24th hour.
RESULTS: Biochemical and hemodynamic parameters did not differ significantly between the groups (P < .05). Baseline ICG-PDR levels of group P compared to group D were 24.7 +/- 14.4 vs 22.2 +/- 10.7, respectively, and after the study, ICG-PDR levels (26.5 +/- 13.7 vs 23.7 +/- 12.4) did not differ in groups (P > .05). When we examined ICG-PDR changes between groups before and after administration, there was no significant difference (P > .05).
CONCLUSION: In our study, we found that neither propofol nor dexmedetomidine infusion affected hepatic blood flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931154     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2008.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  11 in total

Review 1.  The role of the liver in sepsis.

Authors:  Jun Yan; Song Li; Shulin Li
Journal:  Int Rev Immunol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.311

Review 2.  Use of dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic agent in critically ill adult patients: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jen A Tan; Kwok M Ho
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Development of a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modelling Approach to Predict the Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin in Critically Ill Septic Patients.

Authors:  Christian Radke; Dagmar Horn; Christian Lanckohr; Björn Ellger; Michaela Meyer; Thomas Eissing; Georg Hempel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Meta-analysis comparing dexmedetomidine versus standard of care for sedation in patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Basel Abdelazeem; Bilal Malik; Mohamed M G Mohamed; Pramod Savarapu; Sakiru Isa; Babikir Kheiri; Mustafa Hassan
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2021-11-08

5.  Proton nuclear magnetic resonance and pattern recognition analysis of liver extracts from rats under different anesthetics.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Tajima; Keiko Hirakawa; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Atsuhiro Sakamoto
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 1.930

6.  Dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent in critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Laura Pasin; Teresa Greco; Paolo Feltracco; Annalisa Vittorio; Caetano Nigro Neto; Luca Cabrini; Giovanni Landoni; Gabriele Finco; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of dexmedetomidine and esmolol on systemic hemodynamics and exogenous lactate clearance in early experimental septic shock.

Authors:  Glenn Hernández; Pablo Tapia; Leyla Alegría; Dagoberto Soto; Cecilia Luengo; Jussara Gomez; Nicolas Jarufe; Pablo Achurra; Rolando Rebolledo; Alejandro Bruhn; Ricardo Castro; Eduardo Kattan; Gustavo Ospina-Tascón; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 8.  Sedation of mechanically ventilated adults in intensive care unit: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Kun Chen; Hongying Ni; Xiaoling Zhang; Haozhe Fan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The Effect of Dexmedetomidine as a Sedative Agent for Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Caimu Wang; Qijiang Chen; Ping Wang; Weisheng Jin; Chao Zhong; Zisheng Ge; Kangmin Xu
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-13

10.  Unexplained mortality differences between septic shock trials: a systematic analysis of population characteristics and control-group mortality rates.

Authors:  Harm-Jan de Grooth; Jonne Postema; Stephan A Loer; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Armand R Girbes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.