Literature DB >> 19931129

Longer time to peak flow predicts better arterial flow parameters on penile Doppler ultrasound.

Wayland Hsiao1, Adam B Shrewsberry, Kelvin A Moses, Donald Pham, Chad W M Ritenour.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To review the associations between measured variables in Penile Doppler ultrasound procedures. Penile Doppler ultrasound is useful in the evaluation of erectile dysfunction, but there is no uniform standard of performing the procedure. It is generally believed that a peak systolic velocity > 30 cm/s, minimal venous leak, and resistive index > 0.8 are essential for adequate erection. While the arterial parameters are well studied, data on the predictive value of time to peak flow are lacking.
METHODS: Penile duplex Doppler ultrasounds performed for either erectile dysfunction or Peyronie's disease evaluation were reviewed. Clinical records, International Index of Erectile Function scores, and ultrasound variables were examined. "Fast" responders reached maximal peak systolic velocity (PSV) < or = 10 minutes, whereas "slow" responders reached maximal PSV between 15 and 25 minutes.
RESULTS: Of 146 total patients, 36 (25%) were fast responders and 110 (75%), slow responders. No preprocedural characteristics, including the Erectile Function domain score of the International Index of Erectile Function, predicted time to peak flow. Compared with the fast responders, slow responders had higher mean PSV (left: 33.9 +/- 19.5 vs 25.0 +/- 11.7 cm/s, P = .01; and right: 36.4 +/- 21.3 vs 25.0 +/- 13.3 cm/s, P = .002). There was also a higher percentage of patients with average PSV > 30 cm/s in slow responders (58% vs 36%, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between slow and fast responders. However, slow responders did seem to have significantly better arterial flow parameters, although penile dimensions, cavernosal artery diameter, Erectile Function domain scores, and subjective rigidity were similar. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19931129     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current approaches to the diagnosis of vascular erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Ming Ma; Botao Yu; Feng Qin; Jiuhong Yuan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

2.  Penile Hemodynamic Response to Phosphodiesterase Type V Inhibitors after Cavernosal Sparing Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation: A Prospective Randomized Open-Blinded End-Point (PROBE) Study.

Authors:  Adham Zaazaa; Michaela Bayerle-Eder; Ramzy Elnabarawy; Mahmoud Elbitar; Taymour Mostafa
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2021-06-28

3.  Variability in penile duplex ultrasound international practice patterns, technique, and interpretation: an anonymous survey of ISSM members.

Authors:  Mohit Butaney; Nannan Thirumavalavan; Mark S Hockenberry; E Will Kirby; Alexander W Pastuszak; Larry I Lipshultz
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.896

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.