| Literature DB >> 19930701 |
Terrence P McGlynn1, Hee K Choi, Stefanie T Mattingly, Angela Upshaw, Evan K Poirson, Justin Betzelberger.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The isotopic composition of generalist consumers may be expected to vary in space as a consequence of spatial heterogeneity in isotope ratios, the abundance of resources, and competition. We aim to account for the spatial variation in the carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of a generalized predatory species across a 500 ha. tropical rain forest landscape. We test competing models to account for relative influence of resources and competitors to the carbon and nitrogen isotopic enrichment of gypsy ants (Aphaenogaster araneoides), taking into account site-specific differences in baseline isotope ratios.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19930701 PMCID: PMC2788522 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-9-23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Correlation (r) between soil parameters and isotopic composition of A. araneoides.
| Soil nutrient | Correlation (r) with δ15N | Correlation (r) with δ13C |
|---|---|---|
| N | -0.18 | -0.16 |
| P | 0.87 | 0.43 |
| Ca | -0.14 | -0.24 |
| K | 0.37 | 0.28 |
| Fe | -0.10 | -0.48 |
| Mg | -0.38 | 0.05 |
| Mn | 0.22 | 0.39 |
| Al | -0.20 | 0.02 |
Soil nutrients were evaluated as stocks in kg/ha to 10 cm depth. δ15N and δ13C values represent mean values of A. araneoides among seven sites.
Figure 1Soil Phosphorus predicts δ. Across a 500 ha. landscape, soil phosphorus stocks predicted mean δ15N of gypsy ants (panel A) and mean δ15N of the leaf litter, the resource base for gypsy ants (panel B).
Regression models testing for the most parsimonious associations with the relative trophic position of A. araneoides (δ15N- δ15 Nbaseline).
| model (independent factors) | r2 | SS | p | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf litter decomposition rate | 0.056 | 0.13 | 0.610 | -3.90 |
| Log (mass, standing litter) | 0.129 | 0.31 | 0.427 | -4.47 |
| Total soil P (0-10 cm depth) | 0.129 | 0.31 | 0.430 | -4.86 |
| 0.277 | 0.66 | 0.225 | -5.77 | |
| 0.551 | 1.32 | 0.060 | -9.11 | |
| Ant density | 0.157 | 0.38 | 0.379 | -4.70 |
| Ant richness | 0.206 | 0.49 | 0.307 | -5.11 |
| 0.554 | 1.33 | 0.200 | -7.15 | |
| 2.35 | -28.27* | |||
| 0.583 | 1.40 | 0.174 | -7.62 | |
| 0.561 | 1.35 | 0.192 | -7.27 | |
| 0.571 | 1.37 | 0.184 | -7.43 | |
The most parsimonious model is indicated by *. Negative relationships with relative trophic position are indicated by italics.
Regression models to test for the most parsimonious associations with (δ13C- δ13Cbaseline).
| Model (independent factors) | r2 | SS | p | AIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf litter decomposition rate | 0.216 | 0.07 | 0.293 | -19.66 |
| Log (mass, standing litter) | < 0.01 | < 0.001 | 0.987 | -17.96 |
| Total soil P (0-10 cm depth) | 0.183 | 0.06 | 0.339 | -19.36 |
| Colony size | 0.329 | 0.10 | 0.179 | -20.74 |
| Colony growth | 0.002 | < 0.001 | 0.917 | -17.97 |
| Litter-ant density | 0.003 | 0.03 | 0.908 | -17.98 |
| Litter-ant richness | 0.014 | 0.004 | 0.799 | -18.06 |
| Total soil P, colony size | 0.394 | 0.12 | 0.366 | -19.47 |
| Total soil P, leaf litter decomposition rate | 0.399 | 0.12 | 0.361 | -19.52 |
| Leaf litter decomposition rate, colony size | 0.28 | -32.61* | ||
| Total soil P, leaf litter decomposition rate, colony size | 0.929 | 0.28 | 0.032 | -32.42 |
The most parsimonious model is indicated by *. All significant relationships were positive.