Literature DB >> 19930509

Critical action procedures testing: a novel method for test-enhanced learning.

Samuel M Galvagno1, B Scott Segal.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Human error is a leading cause of adverse events in anaesthesia. Residents' knowledge of how to respond to rare, yet potentially life-threatening events has been shown to deteriorate over time and thus cost-effective educational interventions are indicated. Previous research has shown that test-enhanced learning has the potential to strengthen both clinical knowledge and performance. We hypothesised that critical action procedures (CAPs) tests, similar to those employed by high-performance aircraft pilots, would help improve resident knowledge about how to respond to rare and potentially catastrophic events encountered during the perioperative period.
METHODS: Knowledge assessments were administered to 29 first-year anaesthesiology residents over the course of 9 months. Five-minute closed-book tests were administered with fill-in-the-blank questions regarding the American Society of Anesthesiologists' difficult airway guideline, advanced cardiac life support protocols, an institutional airway fire protocol and drug dosing for malignant hyperthermia. Inter-group comparisons were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The difference between the pre-test and final test scores for each subsection was determined with the Mann-Whitney U-test for independent samples.
RESULTS: Composite subtest scores, when compared with baseline pre-test scores and subsequent scores, and when adjusted for attrition, significantly improved over the course of 9 months (20.5% versus 80%; P < or = 0.001). Likert-based survey data indicated a positive report for attainment of knowledge.
CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal observational study of first-year anaesthesiology residents, CAPs testing helped improve knowledge about critical events. Although the study was limited by its small number of subjects, a significant attrition rate and the lack of a control group, it demonstrates a cost-effective educational intervention that improved resident knowledge. This intervention may enable residents to transfer learned skills from theoretical testing situations to real-life scenarios. We propose the use and further study of CAPs testing as a cost-effective modality to augment both simulated and actual experiential learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19930509     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03533.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of the efficacy of test-driven learning versus self-assessment learning.

Authors:  Xiaohua He; Anne Canty
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2013-06-27

2.  Assessing anesthesiology residents' out-of-the-operating-room (OOOR) emergent airway management.

Authors:  Lauryn R Rochlen; Michelle Housey; Ian Gannon; Shannon Mitchell; Deborah M Rooney; Alan R Tait; Milo Engoren
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  mCME project V.2.0: randomised controlled trial of a revised SMS-based continuing medical education intervention among HIV clinicians in Vietnam.

Authors:  Christopher J Gill; Ngoc Bao Le; Nafisa Halim; Cao Thi Hue Chi; Viet Ha Nguyen; Rachael Bonawitz; Pham Vu Hoang; Hoang Long Nguyen; Phan Thi Thu Huong; Anna Larson Williams; Ngoc Anh Le; Lora Sabin
Journal:  BMJ Glob Health       Date:  2018-02-26

4.  Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Spreckelsen; J Juenger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 5.  Conceptualising spaced learning in health professions education: A scoping review.

Authors:  Marjolein Versteeg; Renée A Hendriks; Aliki Thomas; Belinda W C Ommering; Paul Steendijk
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 6.251

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.