Literature DB >> 19930105

Mapping and isolation of the pulmonary veins using the PVAC catheter.

Mattias Duytschaever1, Wim Anne, Giorgi Papiashvili, Yves Vandekerckhove, Rene Tavernier.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC) catheter (a novel multielectrode catheter using duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar radiofrequency energy, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to completely isolate the pulmonary veins (PVs).
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients (60 +/- 8 years) with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent PV isolation with the PVAC catheter. PVAC was used for both mapping and isolation of the PVs (PVAC-guided ablation). After PVAC ablation, presence/absence of PV potentials (PVP) was verified using a conventional circular mapping catheter. In case of residual PVP on the circular catheter, PVAC ablation was continued.
RESULTS: After PVAC-guided ablation 99 of 106 PVs (93%) and 21 of 27 patients (78%) were proven to be isolated. Failure to isolate was due to a mapping failure in four right-sided PVs and a true ablation failure in three right-sided PVs. After continued PVAC ablation, 103 of 106 PVs (97%) and 25 of 27 patients (93%) were shown to be isolated. The total procedural time from femoral vein access to complete catheter withdrawal was 176 +/- 25 minutes. The actual dwelling-time of the PVAC within the left atrium was 102 +/- 37 minutes. Esophageal T degrees rise to >38.5 degrees occurred in nine of 19 monitored patients (47%).
CONCLUSIONS: (1) PVAC-guided ablation (i.e., mapping and ablation with a single catheter) results in isolation of all PVs in 73% of the patients. (2) An additional circular mapping catheter is required to increase complete isolation rate to 93% of the patients. (3) Given the esophageal T degrees rise in almost 50% of patients, safety precautions are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19930105     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02609.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  14 in total

Review 1.  Multi-Electrode Ablation Catheters for AF Ablation: Effective Reality or Elegant Experiment?

Authors:  Lucas Boersma
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 2.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Comparison of the Efficacy of PVAC® and nMARQ for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Avishag Laish-Farkash; Mahmoud Suleiman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2017-04-30

4.  Comparison of PV signal quality using a novel circular mapping and ablation catheter versus a standard circular mapping catheter.

Authors:  Christian von Bary; Sabine Fredersdorf-Hahn; Norbert Heinicke; Carsten Jungbauer; Peter Schmid; Günter A Riegger; Stefan Weber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Predictive value of left atrial volume measured by non-invasive cardiac imaging in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Christian von Bary; Christian Dornia; Christoph Eissnert; Sotirios Nedios; Mattias Roser; Okka W Hamer; Jin-Hong Gerds-Li; Ingo Paetsch; Cosima Jahnke; Rolf Gebker; Stefan Weber; Eckart Fleck; Charalampos Kriatselis
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Pulmonary vein isolation to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: conventional versus multi-electrode radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Rypko J Beukema; Arif Elvan; Jaap Jan J Smit; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Vivek Reddy
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 7.  Phased RF Ablation: Results and Concerns.

Authors:  Alexandra Kiss; Gábor Sándorfi; Edina Nagy-Baló; Mihran Martirosyan; Zoltan Csanadi
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  Pulmonary vein isolation using second-generation single-shot devices: not all the same?

Authors:  Philipp Seidl; Frank Steinborn; Lisa Costello-Boerrigter; Ralf Surber; Paul C Schulze; Christine Böttcher; Andreas Sommermeier; Violeta Mattea; Roland Simeoni; Frank Michael Malur; Harald Lapp; Anja Schade
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Lessons from dissociated pulmonary vein potentials: entry block implies exit block.

Authors:  Mattias Duytschaever; Grim De Meyer; Marta Acena; Milad El-Haddad; Yves De Greef; Frederic Van Heuverswyn; Yves Vandekerckhove; Rene Tavernier; Geoffrey Lee; Peter Kistler
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Pulmonary vein isolation using multi-electrode radiofrequency vs conventional point-by-point radiofrequency ablation: A meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies.

Authors:  Dursun Aras; Serkan Topaloglu; Serkan Cay; Ozcan Ozeke; Firat Ozcan; Goksel Cagirci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2017-02-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.