Literature DB >> 19929184

Primary care guidelines: Senior executives' views on changing health centre practices in hypertension treatment.

Jarja Ijäs1, Seija Alanen, Minna Kaila, Eeva Ketola, Solja Nyberg, Maritta A Välimäki, Marjukka Mäkelä.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the adoption of the national Hypertension Guideline in primary care and to evaluate the consistency of the views of the health centre senior executives on the guideline's impact on clinical practices in the treatment of hypertension in their health centres.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone survey.
SETTING: All municipal health centres in Finland.
SUBJECTS: Health centres where both the head physician and the senior nursing officer responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Agreement in views of the senior executives on the adoption of clinical practices as recommended in the Hypertension Guideline.
RESULTS: Data were available from 143 health centres in Finland (49%). The views of head physicians and senior nursing officers on the adoption of the Hypertension Guideline were not consistent. Head physicians more often than senior nursing officers (44% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) reported that no agreements on recording target blood pressure in patient records existed. A similar discrepancy was seen in recording cardiovascular risk (64% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). Senior executives agreed best on the calibration of sphygmomanometers and the provision of weight-control group counselling.
CONCLUSIONS: Hypertension Guideline recommendations that require joint agreements between professionals are less often adopted than simple, precise recommendations. More emphasis on effective multidisciplinary collaboration is needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19929184      PMCID: PMC3413911          DOI: 10.3109/02813430903438726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  25 in total

1.  Evaluating hypertension control in a managed care setting.

Authors:  M Alexander; I Tekawa; E Hunkeler; B Fireman; R Rowell; J V Selby; B M Massie; W Cooper
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999 Dec 13-27

Review 2.  Evidence of self-report bias in assessing adherence to guidelines.

Authors:  A S Adams; S B Soumerai; J Lomas; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 3.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Marie Johnston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

5.  Organisational determinants of cardiovascular prevention in general practice.

Authors:  Claudia M Lobo; Bernard D Frijling; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Roos M D Bernsen; Jozé C Braspenning; Richard P T M Grol; Ad Prins; Johannes C van der Wouden
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.581

6.  Relationship between practice organization and cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice.

Authors:  B B van Drenth; M E Hulscher; J C van der Wouden; H G Mokkink; C Van Weel; R P Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Improvement in hypertension management in England: results from the Health Survey for England 2003.

Authors:  Paola Primatesta; Neil R Poulter
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.844

8.  Computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) in primary care.

Authors:  E Ketola; M Klockars
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Quality improvement programme for cardiovascular disease risk factor recording in primary care.

Authors:  E Ketola; R Sipilä; M Mäkelä; M Klockars
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2000-09

10.  Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study.

Authors:  R Grol; J Dalhuijsen; S Thomas; C Veld; G Rutten; H Mokkink
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-09-26
View more
  4 in total

1.  Leadership in rural medicine: the organization on thin ice?

Authors:  Jan Hana; Carl Edvard Rudebeck
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.581

2.  A comparative study of two various models of organising diabetes follow-up in public primary health care - the model influences the use of services, their quality and costs.

Authors:  Mikko T Honkasalo; Miika Linna; Timo Sane; Atte Honkasalo; Outi Elonheimo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Does the Cardiologist Have a Key Role in Long-Term Management of Hypertension?

Authors:  Andreas Wilke; Dietmar Steverding
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2011-03-25

4.  Gatekeeping and referrals to cardiologists: general practitioners' views on interactive communications.

Authors:  Steinar Bjornsson; Johann A Sigurdsson; Alma Eir Svavarsdottir; Gunnar Helgi Gudmundsson
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 2.581

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.