Literature DB >> 19928836

Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 5. Force-field-based prediction of binding affinities of ligands to proteins.

Pablo Englebienne1, Nicolas Moitessier.   

Abstract

We report herein our efforts in the development of three empirical scoring functions with application in protein-ligand docking. A first scoring function was developed from 209 crystal structures of protein-ligand complexes and a second one from 946 cross-docked complexes. Tuning of the coefficients for the different terms making up these functions was performed by an iterative approach to optimize the correlations between observed activities and calculated scores. A third scoring function was developed from libraries of known actives and decoys docked to six different protein conformational ensembles. In the latter case, the tuning of the coefficients was performed so as to optimize the area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the discrimination of actives and inactives. The newly developed scoring functions were next assessed on independent sets of protein-ligand complexes for their ability to predict binding affinities and to discriminate actives from inactives. In the first validation the first function, which was trained on active compounds only, performed as well as other commonly used ones. On a high-throughput virtual screening validation on five protein conformational ensembles, the third scoring function that included data from inactive compounds performed significantly better. This validation showed that the inclusion of data from inactive compounds is critical for performance in virtual high-throughput screening applications.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19928836     DOI: 10.1021/ci900251k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Inf Model        ISSN: 1549-9596            Impact factor:   4.956


  5 in total

1.  Experimental versus predicted affinities for ligand binding to estrogen receptor: iterative selection and rescoring of docked poses systematically improves the correlation.

Authors:  James S Wright; James M Anderson; Hooman Shadnia; Tony Durst; John A Katzenellenbogen
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Structural Basis for Achieving GSK-3β Inhibition with High Potency, Selectivity, and Brain Exposure for Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Vadim Bernard-Gauthier; Andrew V Mossine; Ashley Knight; Debasis Patnaik; Wen-Ning Zhao; Chialin Cheng; Hema S Krishnan; Lucius L Xuan; Peter S Chindavong; Surya A Reis; Jinshan Michael Chen; Xia Shao; Jenelle Stauff; Janna Arteaga; Phillip Sherman; Nicolas Salem; David Bonsall; Brenda Amaral; Cassis Varlow; Lisa Wells; Laurent Martarello; Shil Patel; Steven H Liang; Ravi G Kurumbail; Stephen J Haggarty; Peter J H Scott; Neil Vasdev
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 7.446

3.  Retrospective molecular docking study of WY-25105 ligand to β-secretase and bias of the three-dimensional structure flexibility.

Authors:  Leo Ghemtio; Nicolas Muzet
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Shuangye Yin; Xiang S Wang; Shubin Liu; Nikolay V Dokholyan; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.956

5.  Automated Fragmentation QM/MM Calculation of NMR Chemical Shifts for Protein-Ligand Complexes.

Authors:  Xinsheng Jin; Tong Zhu; John Z H Zhang; Xiao He
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.221

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.